public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc3 1/3] rtc-cmos driver
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:35:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070528183513.GA2815@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701051001.58472.david-b@pacbell.net>

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:01:57AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This is an "RTC framework" driver for the "CMOS" RTCs which are standard
> on PCs and some other platforms.  That's MC146818 compatible silicon.
> Advantages of this vs. drivers/char/rtc.c (use one _or_ the other, only
> one will be able to claim the RTC irq) include:

Sorry for getting to this so late - I've only just started playing with 
this driver.

> +static int cmos_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)

This is awkward. At the very least, year will be set to -1. This then 
gets passed through to rtc_tm_to_time, which results in reading 
wakealarm providing very odd feedback. I guess the "right" fix is for 
rtc_tm_to_time to use the current values for anything that's -1?

> +	rtc_control = CMOS_READ(RTC_CONTROL);
> +	rtc_control &= ~(RTC_PIE | RTC_AIE | RTC_UIE);

Do you really want to clobber RTC_AIE on probe? If an alarm has been set 
by the BIOS, it seems a little unfair to disable it on boot.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-28 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-05 18:01 [patch 2.6.20-rc3 1/3] rtc-cmos driver David Brownell
2007-01-05 20:45 ` Alessandro Zummo
2007-01-06  3:10   ` David Brownell
2007-01-06  3:33     ` David Brownell
2007-01-06 17:17       ` Woody Suwalski
2007-01-06 21:17         ` David Brownell
2007-01-07  9:02           ` Russell King
2007-01-09 16:37             ` Woody Suwalski
2007-01-10  0:01               ` David Brownell
2007-01-10  5:27                 ` David Brownell
2007-05-28 18:35 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2007-05-28 21:07   ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070528183513.GA2815@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox