public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)?
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:39:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070530083953.9909bcef.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705301458400.4634@jalava.cc.jyu.fi>

On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:02:49 +0300 (EEST) Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
> > On 5/30/07, Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi> wrote:
> > > Hmmm, I just found something interesting. In 2.6.21.3 the /sbin/init
> > > gets corrupted when I watch the video!
> > >
> > > $ cp /sbin/init init.before
> > > $ mplayer kiwi.flv
> > > $ cp /sbin/init init.after
> > >
> > > The sha1sums are here:
> > >
> > > 52c8d643057619cbe137b8e69d4709ce3bdd832d  init.after
> > > 8efc7864a5b535a9e336fa82e9d7f112f3d956c1  init.before
> > >
> > > It seems that something corrupts memory somewhere...
> > 
> > To debug this a bit further:
> > 
> > $ od -a -t x1 -v init.after > init.after.dump
> > $ od -a -t x1 -v init.before > init.before.dump
> > $ diff -u init.before.dump init.after.dump | less
> > 
> > -0011340  nul nul nul  e9  f0  fe  ff  ff  ff   %   < soh enq  bs   h  80
> > -           00  00  00  e9  f0  fe  ff  ff  ff  25  3c  01  05  08  68  80
> > +0010000    y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul
> > +           79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00
> > +0010020    y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul
> > +           79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00
> > +0011340    y ack nul nul   y ack nul nul  ff   %   < soh enq  bs   h  80
> > +           79  06  00  00  79  06  00  00  ff  25  3c  01  05  08  68  80
> > 
> > The file at offset 0010000 - 0011348 is overwritten with the byte
> > pattern 79 06 00 00.
> > 
> > Do you see anything in the logs or is this a silent corruption? Did
> > you see this corruption with 2.6.19 or 2.6.22-rc3?
> > 
> 
> I recompiled 2.6.22-rc3 and booted it with slub_debug. Now I can't oops
> the kernel, but ./slab_info -v gives me a warning:
> 
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> neofb: no support for 32bpp
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x768) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1152x864) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1024x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> Mode (1280x1024) larger than the LCD panel (800x600)
> *** SLUB kmalloc-1024: Redzone Active@0xc10be860 slab 0xc10217c0
>     offset=2144 flags=0x80004082 inuse=7 freelist=0x00000000
>   Bytes b4 0xc10be850:  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ........ZZZZZZZZ
>     Object 0xc10be860:  00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 20 03 00 00 58 02 00 00 ............X...
>     Object 0xc10be870:  20 03 00 00 58 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....X...........
>     Object 0xc10be880:  10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 ................
>     Object 0xc10be890:  00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>     Object 0xc10be8a0:  00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>     Object 0xc10be8b0:  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
>     Object 0xc10be8c0:  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 a8 61 00 00 ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ....¨a..
>     Object 0xc10be8d0:  58 00 00 00 28 00 00 00 17 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 X...(...........
>    Redzone 0xc10bec60:  4d 6b 00 00                                     Mk..            
> FreePointer 0xc10bec64 -> 0x00006b4d
> Last alloc: 0x6b4d jiffies_ago=4294923792 cpu=27469 pid=27469
> Last free : 0x6b4d jiffies_ago=4294923792 cpu=27469 pid=27469
>     Filler 0xc10bec88:  4d 6b 00 00 4d 6b 00 00                         Mk..Mk..        
>  [<c013f717>] check_object+0x64/0x23d
>  [<c0141371>] validate_slab+0xff/0x12a
>  [<c01413aa>] validate_slab_slab+0xe/0x51
>  [<c0141488>] validate_store+0x9b/0xe8
>  [<c01343d1>] __handle_mm_fault+0x370/0x68b
>  [<c01413ed>] validate_store+0x0/0xe8
>  [<c013eaa6>] slab_attr_store+0x1e/0x22
>  [<c016e470>] sysfs_write_file+0xad/0xd6
>  [<c016e3c3>] sysfs_write_file+0x0/0xd6
>  [<c0143341>] vfs_write+0x8a/0x10c
>  [<c01437d7>] sys_write+0x41/0x67
>  [<c01022c2>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x85
>  =======================
> @@@ SLUB kmalloc-1024: Restoring redzone (0xcc) from 0xc10bec60-0xc10bec63
> 

So something did an overwrite of a 1024-byte kmalloc.  Unfortunately that
overwrite seems to have trashed our last-alloc info, so we don't know who
allocated that memory.  Darn.

Does the problem go away if you disable CONFIG_SLUB and enable CONFIG_SLAB?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-30 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-27  9:06 tty-related oops in latest kernel(s)? Tero Roponen
2007-05-28  7:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-28  7:47   ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-28  8:08   ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-28  9:34   ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-29 16:04     ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-29 18:57       ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-30  3:43         ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-30  3:57         ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-30  5:54           ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-30  5:59             ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-30  6:00             ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-30 12:02             ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-30 15:39               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-30 16:01                 ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-30 16:09                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-30 18:04                     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-05-30 23:14                       ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-05-30 23:18                         ` David Miller
2007-05-30 23:28                           ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-05-31  7:17                         ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-31  9:04                           ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-05-30 18:13                   ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-30 18:27                     ` Tero Roponen
2007-05-30 22:14                   ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-05-30 23:17                   ` Antonino A. Daplas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070530083953.9909bcef.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=teanropo@jyu.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox