public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
To: Mark Adler <madler@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>,
	"Michael-Luke Jones" <mlj28@cam.ac.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, jloup@gzip.org
Subject: Re: JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:05:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705300905.51887.dhazelton@enter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172CB60C-2F1F-4CCE-8AB7-C7CFA1161AA0@alumni.caltech.edu>

On Wednesday 30 May 2007 01:31:19 Mark Adler wrote:
> On May 29, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > skipping some checksum calculation if some
> > flag (PRESET_DICT) is absent from the input stream about to
> > be decompressed ...
>
> You don't need to dissect the header manually to look for that bit.
> If you feed inflate() at least the first two bytes, it will return
> immediately with the Z_NEED_DICT return code if a preset dictionary
> is requested.  You can force inflate() to return immediately after
> decoding the two byte header even if a preset dictionary is not
> requested by using the Z_BLOCK flush code.
>
> Mark

I think that JFFS2 is doing the work of looking for PRESET_DICT itself not 
only to skip the checksum calc, but also to lose the function-call overhead. 
Yes, the performance difference shouldn't be all that great, but might have 
made a difference in some test. When I'm done working on the 
benchmark/testbed for the LZO code proposed for inclusion in the kernel I'll 
do some testing and see how large the difference is in userspace. (for most 
code the differences hold true, though usually with less drastic numbers, in 
kernel)

DRH

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-30 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-28 14:34 [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:40 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 14:49   ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:06     ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:43       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 16:03         ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 17:11           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:59             ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:18             ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 20:52               ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29  5:55             ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29  8:08             ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:40               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-29 12:03                 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:13                   ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:10             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-29 21:26               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-30  5:31                 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30 13:56                   ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-05-30 14:24                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-28 15:30   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 15:47     ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-28 15:55       ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 17:01         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-28 19:51           ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 15:49     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:57   ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29  5:48     ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 13:09       ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-28 22:53 ` Bret Towe
2007-05-28 22:58   ` Bret Towe
2007-05-29  5:58   ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29 20:14     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 20:33       ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 21:48         ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 23:32     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30  5:19       ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-29  8:17 ` Makefile question (was [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6) Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 10:41   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 10:51     ` Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 11:27       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 13:33         ` JFFS2 using 'private' zlib header " Michael-Luke Jones
2007-05-29 13:43           ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-29 15:15             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-29 16:20               ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-30  5:31               ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 13:05                 ` Daniel Hazelton [this message]
2007-05-30 13:30                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 23:02                   ` Mark Adler
2007-05-30 23:26                     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01  3:06                     ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 17:24                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 13:41               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 15:46                 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-30 16:12                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 16:43                     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-29 20:48 ` [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 6 Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30  5:54   ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-30  8:31     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-30 10:47       ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 12:34 ` Nitin Gupta
2007-05-31 18:21   ` Satyam Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705300905.51887.dhazelton@enter.net \
    --to=dhazelton@enter.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jloup@gzip.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madler@alumni.caltech.edu \
    --cc=mlj28@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox