From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cotte@de.ibm.com, hugh@veritas.com,
neilb@suse.de, zanussi@us.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:15:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070601081536.GO32105@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070531110550.GR32105@kernel.dk>
On Thu, May 31 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > This change is wrong. loop or any existing user of ->sendfile absolutely
> > needs to go through a file operations vector so that file-system specific
> > actions such as locking are performed. This is required at least for the
> > clustered filesystems and XFS. The right way to implement this is
> > via do_splice_direct or something similar.
> >
> > do_generic_file_read is only a library function for filesystem use
> > and should never be called directly.
>
> I'll convert it to do_splice_direct(), thanks.
So how does this look? Totally untested, will do that now. It only
covers the read side, the write conversion to splice will happen later.
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 92bac14..3714e60 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/pipe_fs_i.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -401,58 +402,70 @@ struct lo_read_data {
};
static int
-lo_read_actor(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct page *page,
- unsigned long offset, unsigned long size)
+lo_splice_actor(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct pipe_buffer *buf,
+ struct splice_desc *sd)
{
- unsigned long count = desc->count;
- struct lo_read_data *p = desc->arg.data;
+ struct lo_read_data *p = sd->data;
struct loop_device *lo = p->lo;
+ struct page *page = buf->page;
sector_t IV;
+ size_t size;
+ int ret;
- IV = ((sector_t) page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 9))+(offset >> 9);
+ ret = buf->ops->pin(pipe, buf);
+ if (unlikely(ret))
+ return ret;
- if (size > count)
- size = count;
+ IV = ((sector_t) page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - 9))+(buf->offset >> 9);
+ size = sd->len;
- if (lo_do_transfer(lo, READ, page, offset, p->page, p->offset, size, IV)) {
+ if (lo_do_transfer(lo, READ, page, buf->offset, p->page, p->offset, size, IV)) {
size = 0;
printk(KERN_ERR "loop: transfer error block %ld\n",
page->index);
- desc->error = -EINVAL;
+ size = -EINVAL;
}
flush_dcache_page(p->page);
- desc->count = count - size;
- desc->written += size;
- p->offset += size;
+ if (size > 0)
+ p->offset += size;
return size;
}
static int
+lo_direct_splice_actor(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct splice_desc *sd)
+{
+ return __splice_from_pipe(pipe, sd, lo_splice_actor);
+}
+
+static int
do_lo_receive(struct loop_device *lo,
struct bio_vec *bvec, int bsize, loff_t pos)
{
struct lo_read_data cookie;
+ struct splice_desc sd;
struct file *file;
- read_descriptor_t desc;
-
- desc.written = 0;
- desc.count = bvec->bv_len;
- desc.arg.data = &cookie;
- desc.error = 0;
+ int retval;
cookie.lo = lo;
cookie.page = bvec->bv_page;
cookie.offset = bvec->bv_offset;
cookie.bsize = bsize;
+
+ sd.len = 0;
+ sd.total_len = bsize;
+ sd.flags = 0;
+ sd.pos = pos;
+ sd.data = &cookie;
+
file = lo->lo_backing_file;
+ retval = splice_direct_to_actor(file, &sd, lo_direct_splice_actor);
- do_generic_file_read(file, &pos, &desc, lo_read_actor);
- if (desc.written)
- return 0;
+ if (retval < 0)
+ return retval;
- return desc.error;
+ return 0;
}
static int
@@ -687,8 +700,8 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct file *lo_file,
if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
goto out_putf;
- /* new backing store needs to support loop (eg readpage) */
- if (!file->f_mapping->a_ops->readpage)
+ /* new backing store needs to support loop (eg splice_read) */
+ if (!inode->i_fop->splice_read)
goto out_putf;
/* size of the new backing store needs to be the same */
@@ -768,7 +781,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct file *lo_file,
* If we can't read - sorry. If we only can't write - well,
* it's going to be read-only.
*/
- if (!aops->readpage)
+ if (!file->f_op->splice_read)
goto out_putf;
if (aops->prepare_write && aops->commit_write)
lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_USE_AOPS;
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-01 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 10:33 [PATCH] sendfile removal Jens Axboe
2007-05-31 10:47 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-31 10:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-31 10:53 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 4:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 5:41 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 5:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 7:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-06-01 15:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 16:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-01 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-06-01 16:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-02 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-02 15:01 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-02 15:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-02 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20070603130507.GA11170@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-06-03 13:05 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070603142931.GA5916@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-06-03 14:29 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070604004647.GA8076@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-06-04 0:46 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-06-04 8:05 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20070604112214.GA7457@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-06-04 11:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-06-01 16:22 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-05-31 10:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-31 11:05 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-31 12:26 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-31 12:27 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 2:44 ` [PATCH] sendfile removal (nfsd update) Neil Brown
2007-06-01 5:44 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 8:01 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 8:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-05-31 11:04 ` [PATCH] sendfile removal Carsten Otte
2007-05-31 11:06 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-31 15:33 ` Tom Zanussi
2007-05-31 19:01 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-31 17:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-05-31 17:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-31 19:03 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070601081536.GO32105@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zanussi@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox