From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] document Acked-by:
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:35:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070601103543.5681eaa7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11341.1180718845@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:27:25 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> Do Linus/Andrew/major maintainers want Tested-By:'s for patches?
I think it's very useful information to have. For a start, it tells
you who has the hardware and knows how to build a kernel. So if you're
making a change to a driver and want it tested, you can troll the file's
changelog looking for people who might be able to help.
A similar argument would apply to Reported-by:, which we possibly also
need. But it's all perhaps a bit much for poor kernel developers to
keep track of ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-01 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-01 2:09 [patch 1/1] document Acked-by: akpm
2007-06-01 5:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 10:53 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-06-01 19:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-01 19:37 ` Scott Preece
2007-06-01 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 13:34 ` debian developer
2007-06-02 17:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 19:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 22:10 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-01 22:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-01 22:42 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-02 0:37 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-06-02 0:56 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-02 1:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 17:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-01 17:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-06-01 18:14 ` Dave Jones
2007-06-01 18:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 18:28 ` Dave Jones
2007-06-02 17:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-02 18:00 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-06-02 19:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-02 14:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-02 17:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 17:55 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-03 0:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-06-03 2:57 ` Scott Preece
2007-06-03 4:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-03 4:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-03 18:31 ` Scott Preece
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070601103543.5681eaa7.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox