public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: srinivasa@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	vatsa@in.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com, simon.derr@bull.net,
	clameter@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/slab.c:777 warning
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:11:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070601121114.b165f1e8.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706011107540.2284@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

Christoph wrote:
> Hmmmm.... Isnt it easier to set the pidarray to NULL in the case it
> has no objects? Then any deferences will fail. Paul?

>From what I can tell, in 30 seconds of reading, either of these
approaches, Christoph's or Srinivasa's, based on Vatsa's suggestions
-could- be made to work.

I don't understand how Christoph's approach works, as stated, however.

What do you mean, Christoph, by "then any dereferences will fail" ?
That sounds bad to me -- we don't want pointer dereferences failing
in the kernel, do we?  Wouldn't you have to add some more lines of
code, a bit further down, where pidarray is used, to avoid trying to
use it if its NULL?

I think that Srinivasa's point is that it is legitimate for this array
to be empty, and that we have to code for that case, one way or another.
Now that we can't simply kmalloc zero bytes and get away with it, that
requires explicit tests in the code for the empty case, one way or
another.  This sounds like a valid point to me.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-01 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-01  7:27 [RFC] [PATCH] cpuset operations causes Badness at mm/slab.c:777 warning Srinivasa Ds
2007-06-01 10:50 ` Srinivasa Ds
2007-06-01 18:13   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 19:11     ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-06-01 19:18       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 19:47         ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-01 19:51           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 20:02             ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-01 20:06               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 20:19                 ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-01 20:43                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 20:54                     ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-01 20:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-01 20:44     ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-01 20:47     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 20:56       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-01 20:59       ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 21:45         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 22:16           ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 22:20             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 22:33               ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 22:41                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:00                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-01 23:29                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:41                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-01 23:46                         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:57                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-02  0:12                             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-02  0:16                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02  0:26                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-02  1:04                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-02  0:46                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-02  1:05                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-06-02  1:24                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:02                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 23:16                     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:21                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:36                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-01 23:42                         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-01 23:25                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-02  0:41                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-02  0:43             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-02  0:51               ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02  0:59                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070601121114.b165f1e8.pj@sgi.com \
    --to=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=simon.derr@bull.net \
    --cc=srinivasa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox