From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Document the hotplug code is incompatible with x86 irq handling
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:44:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706012244.39019.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m14plrzadk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
[Removed the Zwane's address from the CC list, because I get rejects from it]
On Friday, 1 June 2007 22:29, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > Very well, but could you _please_ give us some time to do this?
> >
> > We know of the problem now and will work to fix it, but it's not _that_ easy.
> >
> > In fact, we also rely on the CPU hotplug's code that takes tasks away from the
> > offlined CPUs (and does the opposite with respect to the onlined CPUs), so
> > we just can't get rid of the CPU hotplug _right_ _now_.
>
> Sure. My primary point was to document this, and get things moving if
> possible to fix it. This patch is 2.6.23 at the earliest, so there is
> some time to work on it even on the most optimistic merge schedule.
>
> I just don't want to be complacent and let this problem sit undetected
> in back corner any more.
So, can you advise what we can do to get the "nonboot" CPUs out of the picture
during a suspend/hibernation?
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-01 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.tUMR7tAB+jMgtfyl/LJ7U9QMgBs@ifi.uio.no>
2007-05-31 14:34 ` [PATCH] x86: Document the hotplug code is incompatible with x86 irq handling Robert Hancock
2007-05-31 15:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 20:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-01 19:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-01 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-01 20:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-01 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-06-01 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-31 13:32 Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-07 14:01 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-12 18:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-06-12 20:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-12 21:56 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-06-12 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-12 22:24 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-06-12 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-22 17:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706012244.39019.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox