From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>
Cc: Anand Jahagirdar <anandjigar@gmail.com>, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
security@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kedar Sovani <kedar@dreamzgroup.com>
Subject: Re: Patch related with Fork Bombing Atack
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:28:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706041128.35321.dhazelton@enter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706041652130.24237@twin.jikos.cz>
On Monday 04 June 2007 10:58:41 Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Anand Jahagirdar wrote:
> > I am forwarding one improved patch related with Fork Bombing
> > Attack. This patch prints a message (only once) which alerts
> > administrator/root user about fork bombing attack. I created this patch
> > to implement my idea of informing administrator about fork bombing
> > attack on his machine only once.
> > This patch overcomes all drawbacks of my previous patch related with
> > fork bombing attack and helps administrator. added comments will
> > definitely help developers.
> >
> > + /*
> > + * following code prints a message which alerts administrator/root *
> > user about fork bombing Attack + */
> > + if ((atomic_read(&p->user->processes) >=
> > (p->signal->rlim [RLIMIT_NPROC].rlim_cur - 1)) &&
> > (atomic_read(&p->user->processes) <
> > p->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_NPROC].rlim_cur)) {
>
> Did this get malformed somehow? Looks like some successive lines got
> pasted together, or something.
Seeing the lack of the '+' I think it's a mangling from not paying attention
to the 80 column marker in the editor.
> > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) &&
> > p->user != &root_user) { + printk(KERN_CRIT"User with uid %d is
> > crossing its Process limit\n",p->user->uid); + }
> > + }
>
> Why not printk_ratelimit() here? Otherwise we have looped back to the
> possibility of user flooding the system logs, which has been already
> discussed in this thread, right?
>
> Also the { and } braces seem redundant.
They are.
Here's two hints:
1) double check for hidden "word wrap" problems. A sane programmers editor
will alert you to this, and careful checking of the patches before posting
will also reveal them. (emacs shows a \ in the 80th column, jed puts a $
there, etc...)
2) when there is a potential for syslog spam - like your patch has - use
printk_ratelimit() instead of printk(). This will throttle the output so that
flooding the syslog is no longer possible.
DRH
ps: you patch is very difficult to apply - try using git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 13:45 Patch related with Fork Bombing Atack Anand Jahagirdar
2007-05-31 13:46 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 6:48 ` Anand Jahagirdar
2007-06-01 7:25 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-01 8:00 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-01 8:02 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-03 23:01 ` Nix
2007-06-04 1:29 ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-06-04 14:49 ` Anand Jahagirdar
2007-06-04 14:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-06-04 15:28 ` Daniel Hazelton [this message]
2007-06-05 14:20 ` Anand Jahagirdar
2007-06-01 8:38 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-06-01 14:29 ` Anand Jahagirdar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706041128.35321.dhazelton@enter.net \
--to=dhazelton@enter.net \
--cc=anandjigar@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=kedar@dreamzgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox