From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.03
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:41:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070604114110.0b88fe7a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a25fd03117c678f17006c5fcefaaed0@pinky>
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:46:24 +0100
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> This version brings a host of changes to cure false positives and
> bugs detected on patches submitted to lkml and -mm. It also brings
> a number of new tests in response to reviews, of particular note:
>
> - catch use of volatile
> - allow deprecated functions to be listed in feature-removal-schedule.txt
> - warn about #ifdef's in c files
> - check that spinlock_t and struct mutex use is commented
> - report on architecture specific defines being used
> - report memory barriers without an associated comment
Oy. I ran checkpatch.pl across this patch and it failed to report upon the
new trailing whitespace which you just tried to add.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-04 9:46 [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.03 Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-04 9:55 ` [PATCH] update feature-removal-schedule.txt to include deprecated functions Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-04 15:49 ` [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.03 jschopp
2007-06-04 16:51 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-04 17:22 ` jschopp
2007-06-05 18:45 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-05 9:56 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-04 16:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-04 18:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-06-04 19:08 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-04 19:08 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-04 20:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-05 18:39 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-08 9:31 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-08 10:08 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-05 8:14 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-06-06 9:05 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-07 14:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-07 14:39 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-07 19:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-07 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-07 23:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-07 23:41 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-08 0:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-08 4:37 ` Jon Masters
2007-06-08 8:58 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-06-08 10:52 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-08 12:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-08 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-08 14:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-08 15:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-08 15:37 ` Jon Masters
2007-06-08 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-08 16:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-08 18:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-06-08 16:03 ` Roland Dreier
2007-06-07 23:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-07 19:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-07 22:18 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-06 11:49 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-07 11:46 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-07 11:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-07 15:16 ` checkpatch.pl: should be executable Andy Whitcroft
2007-06-07 15:33 ` jschopp
2007-06-07 14:22 ` [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.03 Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070604114110.0b88fe7a.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox