From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Carter <jwcart2@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:17:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070604141718.GA29674@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Line.LNX.4.64.0706040924040.11109@d.namei>
* James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> > the latency is caused by a _very_ long loop in the SELinux code:
> >
> > sshd-4828 0.N.. 465894us : avtab_search_node (context_struct_compute_av)
>
> What do the 0DNs fields mean and what did you use to create this
> trace?
i used the latency tracer from -rt. Here's the meaning of the fields:
_------=> CPU#
/ _-----=> irqs-off
| / _----=> need-resched
|| / _---=> hardirq/softirq
||| / _--=> preempt-depth
|||| /
||||| delay
cmd pid ||||| time | caller
\ / ||||| \ | /
trace-it-4751 0D... 0us : __next_cpu (user_trace_start)
it's very easy to interpret: it traces all the function calls the kernel
executes, and puts the symbolic function name (and its parent function)
into the trace, time ordered. So it's a proper execution trace. Normally
you can ignore the 'DN' type of flags - what matters in this case is the
observed 130 msecs latency and the functions that were called while that
latency happened.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-04 11:27 [bug] very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av() Ingo Molnar
2007-06-04 13:25 ` James Morris
2007-06-04 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-06-04 21:11 ` Paul Moore
2007-06-04 21:39 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-04 22:48 ` Paul Moore
2007-06-04 22:54 ` James Morris
2007-06-07 19:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2007-06-07 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-07 20:11 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070604141718.GA29674@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jwcart2@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox