public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:53:16 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070604155316.GA10438@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070601211036.GA23975@duck.suse.cz>

[Jan Kara - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:10:36PM +0200]
| On Wed 30-05-07 16:46:28, Eric Sandeen wrote:
| > Jan Kara wrote:
| > >   Hello,
| > > 
| > > On Thu 24-05-07 19:05:54, Jan Kara wrote:
| > >>   Hello,
| > >>
| > >>   attached is a patch that fixes possible leakage of free blocks / use of
| > >> free blocks in UDF (which spilled nice assertion failures I've added in my
| > >> first round of patches). More details in the changelog. Andrew, please apply.
| > >> Both changes have survived some time of fsx and fsstress testing so they
| > >> should be reasonably safe.
| > >   Sorry for replying to myself but this patch had a minor problem of
| > > printing some bogus warnings when directories were deleted (I wonder why
| > > fsstress didn't find it). Attached is a new version of the patch without
| > > this problem.
| > 
| > Jan, something seems busted here.  I'm getting lockups when testing udf
| > on a single cpu with this last patch in place...
|   Hmm, strange, I was also testing on UP and without problems. And I didn't
| change any locking...
| 
| > I think it's the BKL stumbling on itself.
| > 
| > for example...
| > 
| > static int udf_symlink(struct inode * dir, struct dentry * dentry, const
| > char * symname)
| > {
| > ...
| >         lock_kernel();
| > ...
| > out:
| >         unlock_kernel();
| >         return err;
| > 
| > out_no_entry:
| >         inode_dec_link_count(inode);
| >         iput(inode);
| >         goto out;
| > }
| > 
| > but iput goes
| > iput->iput_final->drop_inode->udf_drop_inode->lock_kernel() again
|   As Andrew already wrote, BKL is free to recurse...
| 
| > looking for the right way around it but figured I'd ping you early :)
|   Thanks for info - I'm now mostly out of email for a few days but I'll
| have a look at it as soon as I return.
| 
| 								Honza
| -- 
| Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
| SuSE CR Labs
| 

Hi Jan,

why can't we combine udf_delete_inode() with udf_drop_inode()?
It'll avoid deadlock.

		Cyrill


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-04 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-24 16:59 [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption Jan Kara
2007-05-24 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF Jan Kara
2007-05-24 20:36   ` Jan Kara
2007-05-30 21:46     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-05-30 22:22       ` Eric Sandeen
2007-05-31 16:48         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-05-31 17:42         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-05-31 17:46           ` Eric Sandeen
2007-06-01 16:49             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-01 17:04               ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 17:15                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-01 17:17                 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-06-01 17:48                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-01 17:51                     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-06-01 17:52                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-01 18:20                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-01 21:10       ` Jan Kara
2007-06-01 21:05         ` Eric Sandeen
2007-06-01 22:37         ` Eric Sandeen
2007-06-01 22:48           ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02  5:17             ` Eric Sandeen
2007-06-02  5:43               ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02  6:34                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-02  6:54                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02  6:59                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-02  7:06                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 14:06                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-02 17:32                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 18:57                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-02 19:16                               ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-02 20:01                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-02 22:49                                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-03  6:28                                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-03  7:22                                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-04 15:53         ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2007-05-24 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-05-24 18:35   ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 18:53     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-05-24 19:23     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-05-24 19:36       ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 19:49         ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070604155316.GA10438@cvg \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox