From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934415AbXFFBUW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:20:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933752AbXFFBUJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:20:09 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:50806 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933190AbXFFBUI (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:20:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:20:08 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: David Rientjes Cc: clameter@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, clameter@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] cpusets: do not allow TIF_MEMDIE tasks to allocate globally Message-Id: <20070605182008.102c3fe9.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070605160149.348b5c4a.pj@sgi.com> <20070605165538.0a3ce6fe.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Sure, that behavior is unchanged. We're relying on > nearest_exclusive_ancestor() to determine if such nodes overlap. Ok ... my points on cpusets semantics having been heard, I stand back down on the matter of memory semantics, where I am not the master. Thanks. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401