From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:02:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070605190200.GB11996@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73r6oxcd47.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
* Andi Kleen (andi@firstfloor.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> writes:
>
> > +#define cond_call_optimized(flags, name, func) \
> > + ({ \
> > + static const char __cstrtab_name_##name[] \
> > + __attribute__((section("__cond_call_strings"))) = #name; \
> > + char condition; \
> > + asm ( ".section __cond_call, \"a\", @progbits;\n\t" \
> > + ".long %1, 0f, %2;\n\t" \
> > + ".previous;\n\t" \
> > + ".align 2\n\t" \
> > + "0:\n\t" \
> > + "movb %3,%0;\n\t" \
> > + : "=r" (condition) \
> > + : "m" (*__cstrtab_name_##name), \
> > + "m" (*(char*)flags), \
> > + "i" ((flags) & CF_STATIC_ENABLE)); \
>
> Remind me what we need the flags again for?
>
> I would prefer to just eliminate them and always require arming.
>
The CF_STATIC_ENABLE could be used to have a cond_call compiled as
active, and could be later desactivated dynamically. Since I don't see
much use to this, I will remove this flag.
>
> > + (likely(!condition)) ? \
> > + (__typeof__(func))0 : \
> > + (func); \
> > + })
> > +
> > +/* cond_call macro selecting the generic or optimized version of cond_call,
> > + * depending on the flags specified. */
> > +#define _cond_call(flags, name, func) \
> > +({ \
> > + (((flags) & CF_LOCKDEP) && ((flags) & CF_OPTIMIZED)) ? \
>
> Similar here? unoptimized condcalls don't make much sense.
> I also don't understand what the LOCKDEP flag is good for.
>
unoptimized condcalls will now be a simple static variable usage (since
the new condcalls will simply be an infrastructure for synchronizing a
static variable with load immediates).
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/i386/kernel/condcall.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/i386/kernel/condcall.c 2007-05-17 01:52:38.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > +/* condcall.c
> > + *
> > + * - Erratum 49 fix for Intel PIII.
> > + * - Still present on newer processors : Intel Core 2 Duo Processor for Intel
> > + * Centrino Duo Processor Technology Specification Update, AH33.
> > + * Unsynchronized Cross-Modifying Code Operations Can Cause Unexpected
> > + * Instruction Execution Results.
>
> Can you please define a generic utility function to do self modifying
> code? There are other places that do it too.
>
If you are talking about paravirt ops, they seem to only modify code
on the 1st CPU before other CPUs are turned on. But I might be wrong.
Also, there are 2 simplifications here which do not address the general
case. Those simplifications are done so I can use the cond_calls within
the markers in as many code paths as possible.
1 - When the breakpoint is used (x86), I simply skip the load immediate
instead of single-stepping the instruction. I can do this because I know
that the only effect that the load immediate has is to populate a
register. Since I make sure that I am doing a transition 0 <-> !0, I can
afford leaving this register in an unknown state during the transition.
2 - In order to patch the code on other architectures too, I have to
provide atomic instruction modification. It heavily depends on the
instruction size and their alignment. Once again, I would have to use
breakpoints and single-stepping to replace the instructions (in every
architecture), instead of doing a simple operation replacement with
memcpy.
Because I control the alignment and size of the instructions I replace,
I do not depend on breakpoints (except on x86-like architectures), which
makes things much more solid reentrancy-wise and lets me use the
condcalls within the markers in tricky code paths.
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cond_call_mutex);
>
> All locks need a comment describing what they protect and the hierarchy if
> any.
>
ok
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-05 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-30 14:00 [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls - for 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 1/9] Conditional Calls - Architecture Independent Code Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 16:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 13:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 18:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-04 19:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-13 15:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-13 21:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-14 16:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-14 21:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-20 21:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-21 13:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-21 13:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 16:08 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 16:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 17:07 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 18:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 18:49 ` Matt Mackall
2007-06-01 19:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-01 20:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 20:44 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 22:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 18:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 3/9] Conditional Calls - Non Optimized Architectures Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 4/9] Conditional Calls - Add kconfig menus Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 13:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-05 19:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 6/9] Conditional Calls - PowerPC Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 7/9] Conditional Calls - Documentation Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 8/9] F00F bug fixup for i386 - use conditional calls Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 21:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 21:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 14:00 ` [patch 9/9] Scheduler profiling - Use " Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 15:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-06-01 16:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-01 16:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 20:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-31 21:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 23:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-06-04 22:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-30 21:44 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-31 21:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 13:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 22:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-31 22:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-04 22:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-29 18:33 [patch 0/9] Conditional Calls Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-05-29 18:34 ` [patch 5/9] Conditional Calls - i386 Optimization Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070605190200.GB11996@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox