Re: [patch 1/2] ufd v1 - unsequential O(1) fdmap core

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:

> > For example, the recent futex.c changes you did in commit 34f01cc1 
> > are, and unfortunately there's no better word i can find: plain 
> > disgusting. You apparently have plopped the 'fshared' code into the 
> > existing logic via conditionals and have blown up the complexity of 
> > the functions for no good reason - instead of neatly separating them 
> > out. You have added _33_ (thirty-three!) new 'if' branches to 
> > futex.c! The feature you introduced is nice and useful, but for 
> > heaven's sake please work on cleanliness of your code some more and 
> > undo that colossal damage ... preferably before working on other 
> > areas of the kernel.
> 
> This code took the normal path for inclusion and discussion. If you 
> find it so horrible, you should complained before. Fact is that you 
> Acked it :)

yes, of course, i still think it's a good and nice patch, all things 
considered =B-)

> If you wanted to make a joke, I find it quite misplaced.

no, i just wanted to make a demonstration that one can be pretty nasty 
in on-lkml replies while being technically correct :-) I think you went 
a bit overboard in your replies to Davide. Lets move this back into 
constructive channels, ok? :)

	Ingo