public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel@hansmi.ch>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:28:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070606092837.GA19712@hansmi.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0706051018360.3662-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> (Depending on which version of the kernel you are looking at -- [...]
> Earlier versions did behave the way you describe.)

I was looking at 2.6.22-rc3 which might explain the differences.

> So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you 
> think.  I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power() 
> entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all.

Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it
still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the
changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM?

Greets,
Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-06  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-31 21:34 [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug Michael Hanselmann
2007-06-01 14:19 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2007-06-02 12:40   ` Michael Hanselmann
2007-06-02 14:49     ` Alan Stern
2007-06-04 21:05       ` Michael Hanselmann
2007-06-05 14:24         ` Alan Stern
2007-06-06  9:28           ` Michael Hanselmann [this message]
2007-06-06 14:35             ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070606092837.GA19712@hansmi.ch \
    --to=linux-kernel@hansmi.ch \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox