From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3fs: umount+sync not enough to guarantee metadata-on-disk
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:45:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070607124507.79d8da54.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46682E4E.1070303@redhat.com>
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:11:58 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/07/2007 11:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> mount /var/lib/mythtv -oremount,ro
> >> sync
> >> umount /var/lib/mythtv
> >
> > Did this succeed? If the application is still truncating that file, the
> > umount should have failed.
>
> Shouldn't sync should wait for truncate to finish?
I can't think of anything in there at present which would cause that to
happen, and it's not immediately obvious how we _could_ make it happen - we
have an inode which potentially has no dirty pages and which is itself
clean. The truncate can span multiple journal commits, so forcing a
journal commit in sync() won't necessarily block behind the truncate.
I guess we could ask sync to speculatively take and release every inode's
i_mutex or something. But even that would involve quite some hoop-jumping
due to those infuriating spinlock-protected list_heads on the superblock.
hmm.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-07 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-07 13:44 ext3fs: umount+sync not enough to guarantee metadata-on-disk Mark Lord
2007-06-07 15:41 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-07 16:01 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-07 17:09 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2007-06-10 18:27 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-12 15:15 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2007-06-14 19:01 ` Phillip Susi
2007-06-07 16:11 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-06-07 19:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-06-07 21:38 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-07 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-08 14:51 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-09 2:58 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-11 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2007-06-11 22:47 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-12 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2007-06-07 21:43 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-10 18:31 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-11 11:05 ` Jan Kara
2007-06-11 22:46 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070607124507.79d8da54.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox