From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, malattia@linux.it,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:16:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070607231644.GA8936@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DFEF91B22ED07447AB6AA4B237F913F9524D64@ausx3mpc125.aus.amer.dell.com>
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com wrote:
>
> I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is
> pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier
> with a spinlock held. I haven't been doing this long enough to know
> exactly which kernel this patch should be against, so let me know if
> this ins't good. Thanks!
>
>
> This patch (for the 2.6.21.3 kernel plus previously sent cpufreq
> notifier patch) fixes a bug caused by calling
> cpufreq_unregister_notifier (which can sleep) while holding a spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart_hayes@dell.com>
Thanks, I've merged this with your previous patch. Sorry for the
previous confusion as to where this patch was applied against (ended up
in my -stable queue...)
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-07 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-21 2:44 [2.6.22-rc1-mm1] ehci-hcd - BUG: scheduling while atomic: rmmod/0x00000001/4568 Mattia Dongili
2007-05-25 21:40 ` Greg KH
2007-05-25 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-29 15:14 ` Stuart_Hayes
2007-05-29 16:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 15:26 ` [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd Stuart_Hayes
2007-06-07 4:19 ` Greg KH
2007-06-07 5:52 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-07 6:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-07 23:16 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070607231644.GA8936@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox