From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757088AbXFJQKt (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:10:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751182AbXFJQKk (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:10:40 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:39290 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750843AbXFJQKk (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:10:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:13:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Tarkan Erimer Cc: debian developer , "david@lang.hm" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Message-ID: <20070610161306.GA12310@kroah.com> References: <466A3EC6.6030706@netone.net.tr> <18026.16739.228277.938421@notabene.brown> <20070609071231.GL2649@lug-owl.de> <466BB9B0.5030908@netone.net.tr> <466BCBBC.90305@netone.net.tr> <466C0901.4000405@netone.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <466C0901.4000405@netone.net.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 05:21:53PM +0300, Tarkan Erimer wrote: > I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" the > OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL compatible.). The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to accept GPLv3, why not discuss this with them if you want to try to change their minds? > So,we should have more fruits (like ZFS,DTrace etc.) ;-) I think the transfer would be more the other way, we have a zillion more things that they do not than the other way around. thanks, greg k-h