public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	efault@gmx.de, kernel@kolivas.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au,
	tingy@cs.umass.edu, tong.n.li@intel.com, wli@holomorphy.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com,
	balbir@in.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/6] Fix (bad?) interactions between SCHED_RT and SCHED_NORMAL tasks
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:25:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070611155504.GD2109@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070611154724.GA32435@in.ibm.com>

Currently nr_running and raw_weighted_load fields in runqueue affect
some CFS calculations (like distribute_fair_add, enqueue_sleeper etc).

These fields however are shared between tasks of all classes, which can
potentialy affect those calculations for SCHED_NORMAL tasks. However I
do not know of any bad behaviour caused by not splitting these fields (like
this patch does).

This split is neverthless needed for subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


---
 kernel/sched.c      |  134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 kernel/sched_fair.c |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

Index: current/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/kernel/sched.c	2007-06-09 15:07:32.000000000 +0530
+++ current/kernel/sched.c	2007-06-09 15:07:36.000000000 +0530
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@
 
 /* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
 struct lrq {
+	long nr_running;
 	unsigned long raw_weighted_load;
 	#define CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX 5
 	unsigned long cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
@@ -125,6 +126,7 @@
 
 	u64 fair_clock, delta_fair_clock;
 	u64 exec_clock, delta_exec_clock;
+	u64 last_tick;  /* when did we last smoothen cpu load? */
 	s64 wait_runtime;
 	unsigned long wait_runtime_overruns, wait_runtime_underruns;
 
@@ -148,12 +150,18 @@
 	 * remote CPUs use both these fields when doing load calculation.
 	 */
 	long nr_running;
-	struct lrq lrq;
+	unsigned long raw_weighted_load;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	#define CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX 5
+	unsigned long cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
 
 	unsigned char idle_at_tick;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
 	unsigned char in_nohz_recently;
 #endif
+#endif
+	struct lrq lrq;
+
 	u64 nr_switches;
 
 	/*
@@ -589,13 +597,13 @@
 static inline void
 inc_raw_weighted_load(struct rq *rq, const struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load += p->se.load_weight;
+	rq->raw_weighted_load += p->se.load_weight;
 }
 
 static inline void
 dec_raw_weighted_load(struct rq *rq, const struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load -= p->se.load_weight;
+	rq->raw_weighted_load -= p->se.load_weight;
 }
 
 static inline void inc_nr_running(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
@@ -741,7 +749,7 @@
 /* Used instead of source_load when we know the type == 0 */
 unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
 {
-	return cpu_rq(cpu)->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+	return cpu_rq(cpu)->raw_weighted_load;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -876,9 +884,9 @@
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
 	if (type == 0)
-		return rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+		return rq->raw_weighted_load;
 
-	return min(rq->lrq.cpu_load[type-1], rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load);
+	return min(rq->cpu_load[type-1], rq->raw_weighted_load);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -890,9 +898,9 @@
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
 	if (type == 0)
-		return rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+		return rq->raw_weighted_load;
 
-	return max(rq->lrq.cpu_load[type-1], rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load);
+	return max(rq->cpu_load[type-1], rq->raw_weighted_load);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -903,7 +911,7 @@
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	unsigned long n = rq->nr_running;
 
-	return n ? rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load / n : SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+	return n ? rq->raw_weighted_load / n : SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1592,54 +1600,6 @@
 	return running + uninterruptible;
 }
 
-static void update_load_fair(struct rq *this_rq)
-{
-	unsigned long this_load, fair_delta, exec_delta, idle_delta;
-	u64 fair_delta64, exec_delta64, tmp64;
-	unsigned int i, scale;
-
-	this_rq->lrq.nr_load_updates++;
-	if (!(sysctl_sched_features & 64)) {
-		this_load = this_rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
-		goto do_avg;
-	}
-
-	fair_delta64 = this_rq->lrq.delta_fair_clock + 1;
-	this_rq->lrq.delta_fair_clock = 0;
-
-	exec_delta64 = this_rq->lrq.delta_exec_clock + 1;
-	this_rq->lrq.delta_exec_clock = 0;
-
-	if (fair_delta64 > (u64)LONG_MAX)
-		fair_delta64 = (u64)LONG_MAX;
-	fair_delta = (unsigned long)fair_delta64;
-
-	if (exec_delta64 > (u64)TICK_NSEC)
-		exec_delta64 = (u64)TICK_NSEC;
-	exec_delta = (unsigned long)exec_delta64;
-
-	idle_delta = TICK_NSEC - exec_delta;
-
-	tmp64 = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE * exec_delta64;
-	do_div(tmp64, fair_delta);
-	tmp64 *= exec_delta64;
-	do_div(tmp64, TICK_NSEC);
-	this_load = (unsigned long)tmp64;
-
-do_avg:
-	/* Update our load: */
-	for (i = 0, scale = 1; i < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; i++, scale += scale) {
-		unsigned long old_load, new_load;
-
-		/* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */
-
-		old_load = this_rq->lrq.cpu_load[i];
-		new_load = this_load;
-
-		this_rq->lrq.cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
-	}
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
 /*
@@ -2003,7 +1963,7 @@
 
 			avg_load += load;
 			sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
-			sum_weighted_load += rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+			sum_weighted_load += rq->raw_weighted_load;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -2238,11 +2198,11 @@
 		rq = cpu_rq(i);
 
 		if (rq->nr_running == 1 &&
-				 rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load > imbalance)
+				 rq->raw_weighted_load > imbalance)
 			continue;
 
-		if (rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load > max_load) {
-			max_load = rq->lrq.raw_weighted_load;
+		if (rq->raw_weighted_load > max_load) {
+			max_load = rq->raw_weighted_load;
 			busiest = rq;
 		}
 	}
@@ -2576,6 +2536,32 @@
 	spin_unlock(&target_rq->lock);
 }
 
+static void update_load(struct rq *this_rq)
+{
+	unsigned long this_load;
+	unsigned int i, scale;
+
+	this_load = this_rq->raw_weighted_load;
+
+	/* Update our load: */
+	for (i = 0, scale = 1; i < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; i++, scale += scale) {
+		unsigned long old_load, new_load;
+
+		/* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */
+
+		old_load = this_rq->cpu_load[i];
+		new_load = this_load;
+		/*
+		 * Round up the averaging division if load is increasing. This
+		 * prevents us from getting stuck on 9 if the load is 10, for
+		 * example.
+		 */
+		if (new_load > old_load)
+			new_load += scale-1;
+		this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
+	}
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
 static struct {
 	atomic_t load_balancer;
@@ -2822,14 +2808,14 @@
 	if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->next_balance))
 		raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
 }
-#else
+#else	/* CONFIG_SMP */
 /*
  * on UP we do not need to balance between CPUs:
  */
 static inline void idle_balance(int cpu, struct rq *rq)
 {
 }
-#endif
+#endif	/* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
 
@@ -2953,8 +2939,8 @@
 
 	if (!idle_at_tick)
 		task_running_tick(rq, p);
-	update_load_fair(rq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	update_load(rq);
 	rq->idle_at_tick = idle_at_tick;
 	trigger_load_balance(cpu);
 #endif
@@ -6090,6 +6076,18 @@
 		&& addr < (unsigned long)__sched_text_end);
 }
 
+static inline void init_lrq(struct lrq *lrq, struct rq *rq)
+{
+	int j;
+
+	lrq->tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT;
+	lrq->fair_clock = 1;
+	lrq->last_tick = rq_clock(rq);
+	lrq->nr_running = 0;
+	for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
+		lrq->cpu_load[j] = 0;
+}
+
 void __init sched_init(void)
 {
 	int highest_cpu = 0;
@@ -6110,12 +6108,12 @@
 		spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
 		lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key);
 		rq->nr_running = 0;
-		rq->lrq.tasks_timeline = RB_ROOT;
-		rq->clock = rq->lrq.fair_clock = 1;
+		rq->clock = 1;
+		init_lrq(&rq->lrq, rq);
 
-		for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
-			rq->lrq.cpu_load[j] = 0;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+		for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
+			rq->cpu_load[j] = 0;
 		rq->sd = NULL;
 		rq->active_balance = 0;
 		rq->push_cpu = 0;
Index: current/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c	2007-06-09 15:07:33.000000000 +0530
+++ current/kernel/sched_fair.c	2007-06-09 15:07:36.000000000 +0530
@@ -64,9 +64,7 @@
 
 static long lrq_nr_running(struct lrq *lrq)
 {
-	struct rq *rq = lrq_rq(lrq);
-
-	return rq->nr_running;
+	return lrq->nr_running;
 }
 
 #define entity_is_task(se)	1
@@ -119,6 +117,8 @@
 
 	rb_link_node(&p->run_node, parent, link);
 	rb_insert_color(&p->run_node, &lrq->tasks_timeline);
+	lrq->raw_weighted_load += p->load_weight;
+	lrq->nr_running++;
 }
 
 static inline void __dequeue_entity(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *p)
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@
 	if (lrq->rb_leftmost == &p->run_node)
 		lrq->rb_leftmost = NULL;
 	rb_erase(&p->run_node, &lrq->tasks_timeline);
+	lrq->raw_weighted_load -= p->load_weight;
+	lrq->nr_running--;
 }
 
 static inline struct rb_node * first_fair(struct lrq *lrq)
@@ -570,12 +572,69 @@
 		update_stats_wait_start(lrq, prev, now);
 }
 
+static void update_load_fair(struct lrq *this_lrq)
+{
+	unsigned long this_load, fair_delta, exec_delta, idle_delta;
+	u64 fair_delta64, exec_delta64, tmp64;
+	unsigned int i, scale;
+
+	this_lrq->nr_load_updates++;
+	if (!(sysctl_sched_features & 64)) {
+		this_load = this_lrq->raw_weighted_load;
+		goto do_avg;
+	}
+
+	fair_delta64 = this_lrq->delta_fair_clock + 1;
+	this_lrq->delta_fair_clock = 0;
+
+	exec_delta64 = this_lrq->delta_exec_clock + 1;
+	this_lrq->delta_exec_clock = 0;
+
+	if (fair_delta64 > (u64)LONG_MAX)
+		fair_delta64 = (u64)LONG_MAX;
+	fair_delta = (unsigned long)fair_delta64;
+
+	if (exec_delta64 > (u64)TICK_NSEC)
+		exec_delta64 = (u64)TICK_NSEC;
+	exec_delta = (unsigned long)exec_delta64;
+
+	idle_delta = TICK_NSEC - exec_delta;
+
+	tmp64 = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE * exec_delta64;
+	do_div(tmp64, fair_delta);
+	tmp64 *= exec_delta64;
+	do_div(tmp64, TICK_NSEC);
+	this_load = (unsigned long)tmp64;
+
+do_avg:
+	/* Update our load: */
+	for (i = 0, scale = 1; i < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; i++, scale += scale) {
+		unsigned long old_load, new_load;
+
+		/* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */
+
+		old_load = this_lrq->cpu_load[i];
+		new_load = this_load;
+
+		this_lrq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
+	}
+}
+
 static void entity_tick(struct lrq *lrq, struct sched_entity *curr)
 {
 	struct sched_entity *next;
 	struct rq *rq = lrq_rq(lrq);
 	u64 now = __rq_clock(rq);
 
+	/* replay load smoothening for all ticks we lost */
+	while (time_after_eq64(now, lrq->last_tick)) {
+		update_load_fair(lrq);
+		lrq->last_tick += TICK_NSEC;
+	}
+	/* deal with time wraps */
+	if (unlikely(now - lrq->last_tick > TICK_NSEC))
+		lrq->last_tick = now;
+
 	/*
 	 * Dequeue and enqueue the task to update its
 	 * position within the tree:
-- 
Regards,
vatsa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-11 15:47 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] Introduce struct sched_entity and struct lrq Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 18:48   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-11 18:56     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12  2:15   ` [ckrm-tech] " Balbir Singh
2007-06-12  3:52     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] task's cpu information needs to be always correct Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12  2:17   ` [ckrm-tech] " Balbir Singh
2007-06-11 15:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] core changes in CFS Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12  2:29   ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-12  4:22     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-06-12  9:03   ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] Fix (bad?) interactions between SCHED_RT and SCHED_NORMAL tasks Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-12 10:26     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12 12:23       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-12 13:30         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12 14:31           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-12 15:43             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] core changes for group fairness Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-13 20:56   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-06-14 12:06     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 15:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] Hook up to container infrastructure Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 16:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-11 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-11 19:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12  5:50   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-12  6:26     ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]       ` <20070612072742.GA785@in.ibm.com>
2007-06-12 10:56         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-15 12:46       ` Kirill Korotaev
2007-06-15 14:06         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070611155504.GD2109@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=tingy@cs.umass.edu \
    --cc=tong.n.li@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox