public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Drebes <lists-receive@programmierforen.de>
To: "Darren Jenkins" <darrenrjenkins@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jan-Benedict Glaw" <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>,
	kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Karsten Keil" <kkeil@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:51:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706112051.12407.lists-receive@programmierforen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82faac5b0706110525s56bade43rb24619b54687770d@mail.gmail.com>

<snip>
> I think what was meant here was to remove _all_ the macros that you
> assigned to the ARRAY_SIZE() macro.
Yes, absolutely. I overlooked the 'eg.' in Jan-Benedict's post. Sorry for that.

> If you look at the two advantages replacing code with the ARRAY_SIZE()
> macro has;
> 1. More readable/consistent code.
> 2. Faster compile times, because of less macros being defined.
ack. The arguments for the consistency that I mentioned in my last post
don't hold for a solution that removes all of the macros. So I'm absolutely
fine with a new patch that removes them all.
 
	Andi

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-10 10:35 [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof Andi Drebes
2007-06-10 13:11 ` Karsten Keil
2007-06-10 13:14   ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-06-11  9:20     ` Andi Drebes
2007-06-11 12:25       ` [KJ] " Darren Jenkins
2007-06-11 17:47         ` Karsten Keil
2007-06-11 18:53           ` Andi Drebes
2007-06-11 18:59           ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2007-06-11 18:51         ` Andi Drebes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706112051.12407.lists-receive@programmierforen.de \
    --to=lists-receive@programmierforen.de \
    --cc=darrenrjenkins@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox