public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@gmail.com>
Cc: Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@debianpt.org>,
	ck@vds.kolivas.org,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:04:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070612140407.GA19543@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea7e82ce0706120039n675a361emc214b2ecca964b75@mail.gmail.com>


* Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@gmail.com> wrote:

> The output of massive_intr can be found here :
> http://www.yoper.com/scheduler-test/

here's the spread of the massive_intr results (the average 'jitter' of 
the second column of the results - lower values are indicating more 
stable / more fair massive_intr results, in percentage):

               CFS         SD
            ----------------------
     10:       0.02       0.55
     20:       0.21       0.78
     30:       0.26       0.95
     40:       0.27       1.46
     50:       0.37       1.24
     60:       0.37       0.92

but of course i'm primarily interested is the observed difference in 
interactivity :-)

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-12 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-12  0:30 call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans) Miguel Figueiredo
2007-06-12  7:39 ` Tobias Gerschner
2007-06-12  8:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12  8:51     ` Tobias Gerschner
2007-06-12  8:55       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12  8:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12 10:33       ` Con Kolivas
2007-06-12 10:40         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-12 14:04   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-06-12 16:52 ` Martin Steigerwald
2007-06-15 21:19   ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-06-13  1:36 ` Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2007-06-13  1:54   ` Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2007-06-14  7:56     ` call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: " Jarek Poplawski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-14 10:10 call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] " Tobias Gerschner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070612140407.GA19543@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=elmig@debianpt.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tobias.gerschner@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox