From: Andi Drebes <lists-receive@programmierforen.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:41:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706122041.06252.lists-receive@programmierforen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706101544.35463.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
First off: sorry for my late answer.
> I agree the ACPI CA is a nuisance. But in this case, we're making
> a mountain out of a molehill. I suspect that if somebody spent the
> 15 minutes to make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
> and the generic Intel one and license it appropriately, Len would
> happily apply the patch.
I hope I got everything right. Here's what I understood so far:
The ACPI Subsystem in the kernel is derived from intel sources. I searched
the web for information about that and finally found
http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm
Is that the right one? So what I would have to do in order to
"make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
and the generic Intel one" is to modify those sources aswell,
send a patch to Intel and another one back to the
lkml.
Is that right? Or am I totally wrong?
Cheers,
Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-12 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200705261239.27485.lists-receive@programmierforen.de>
[not found] ` <46581C06.7000005@student.ltu.se>
[not found] ` <200705261558.24912.lists-receive@programmierforen.de>
[not found] ` <200705301525.05905.lenb@kernel.org>
2007-05-31 9:56 ` [KJ] [PATCH] drivers/acpi: sizeof/sizeof array size calculations replaced with ARRAY_SIZE Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-10 10:57 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-10 21:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-06-12 18:41 ` Andi Drebes [this message]
2007-06-12 18:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-06-13 21:21 ` Andi Drebes
2007-06-15 17:56 ` Andi Drebes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706122041.06252.lists-receive@programmierforen.de \
--to=lists-receive@programmierforen.de \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox