public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix improper .init-type section references
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:10:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070613081049.GA21364@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0706130039r26e9522q98d9645809136ea7@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:09:07PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> 
> i.e. don't discard anything at build time, and link the .exit.{text,
> data} sections
> into the kernel image for _all_ archs? (otherwise how do we avoid
> special-casing/
> checking for the arch in modpost and warn/not-warn about invalid/valid 
> cases)
> 
> But then why not simply lose the __exit (and .exit.*) altogether? Because
> __exit becomes redundant in the suggested changed semantics -- just mark
> all the cleanup code as __init too (when it's built-in, the only
> callsite for the
> cleanup code would be from the startup code in .init.*, and when modular,
> __init and __exit lose all relevance anyway).

The reason we do it today is to save memory in a memory constrained environment.
So with such a suggestion you should back it up with numbers.

How much RAM is wasted by keeping the __init and _exit sections
in memory for a normal embedded build?

You could try a random defconfig for arm or mips since they are
embedded in general. Using defconfig for i386 could tell us
a little but not that important.

And when evaluating the numbers think of maybe 8 MB RAM in total, no swap
storage, and sloow filesystem for permanent storage.

	Sam

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-13  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-12  7:48 [PATCH] x86: fix improper .init-type section references Jan Beulich
2007-06-12 11:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 12:09   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 12:43     ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-12 13:32       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 13:49         ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-12 14:09           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 18:00             ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-13  3:18               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-13  4:35                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-13  6:59                   ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-13  7:39                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-13  7:49                       ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-13  8:10                       ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-06-12 17:56       ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070613081049.GA21364@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@x86-64.org \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox