From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix improper .init-type section references
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:10:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070613081049.GA21364@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0706130039r26e9522q98d9645809136ea7@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:09:07PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> i.e. don't discard anything at build time, and link the .exit.{text,
> data} sections
> into the kernel image for _all_ archs? (otherwise how do we avoid
> special-casing/
> checking for the arch in modpost and warn/not-warn about invalid/valid
> cases)
>
> But then why not simply lose the __exit (and .exit.*) altogether? Because
> __exit becomes redundant in the suggested changed semantics -- just mark
> all the cleanup code as __init too (when it's built-in, the only
> callsite for the
> cleanup code would be from the startup code in .init.*, and when modular,
> __init and __exit lose all relevance anyway).
The reason we do it today is to save memory in a memory constrained environment.
So with such a suggestion you should back it up with numbers.
How much RAM is wasted by keeping the __init and _exit sections
in memory for a normal embedded build?
You could try a random defconfig for arm or mips since they are
embedded in general. Using defconfig for i386 could tell us
a little but not that important.
And when evaluating the numbers think of maybe 8 MB RAM in total, no swap
storage, and sloow filesystem for permanent storage.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-13 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-12 7:48 [PATCH] x86: fix improper .init-type section references Jan Beulich
2007-06-12 11:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 12:09 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 12:43 ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-12 13:32 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 13:49 ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-12 14:09 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-12 18:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-13 3:18 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-13 4:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-13 6:59 ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-13 7:39 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-06-13 7:49 ` Jan Beulich
2007-06-13 8:10 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-06-12 17:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070613081049.GA21364@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@x86-64.org \
--cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox