From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: pj@sgi.com
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: cpuset attach_task to touch per-cpu kernel threads?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:19:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070621014935.GF10980@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Paul,
You had once revealed a cute one-line command to move all tasks from
one cpuset to another [1], which was:
# move all tasks from top cpuset to 'foo' cpuset
sed -nu p < /dev/cpuset/tasks > /dev/cpuset/foo/tasks
I somewhat regret now having fallen for it and using it in my scripts.
To my agony, I found that it moves per-cpu kernel threads too, forcibly
breaking their affinity. In my case, rq->migration thread
(kernel/sched.c) was moved off cpu3 and started running on cpu2, which
caused nasty problems for me. I am sure this can lead to problems for
other per-cpu kernel threads, if their assumption of per-cpu'ness is
broken this way.
One could argue that 'root' user did this and nothing wrong in assuming
he knows what he is doing.
But I am wondering if attach_task() should leave kernel threads alone and
act only upon user-space threads. Or maybe allow movement if it doesn't
result in changing kernel-threads's cpu affinity.
Do you have anything to say regarding this?
Fyi, this was what I was doing (as root):
#!/bin/bash
mount -t container -o cpuset none /dev/cpuset
cd /dev/cpuset
mkdir sys # create a cpuset to move all tasks into
mkdir test # test cpuset in which my tests will run
# Assign cpus to both cpusets
cd sys; echo 0-2 > cpus; echo 0 > mems; echo 1 > cpu_exclusive; cd ..
cd test; echo 3 > cpus; echo 0 > mems; echo 1 > cpu_exclusive; cd ..
# Move all tasks to 'sys' cpuset so that cpu3 is dedicated to
# only my chosen tasks
sed -nu p < /dev/cpuset/tasks > /dev/cpuset/tasks
echo $$ > test/tasks
/path_to/test_prg
References:
1. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=115627306628524
--
Regards,
vatsa
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-21 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 1:49 Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-06-21 2:35 ` cpuset attach_task to touch per-cpu kernel threads? Paul Jackson
2007-06-21 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-21 17:07 ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-21 17:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-21 17:51 ` Paul Jackson
2007-06-22 17:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-06-22 17:41 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070621014935.GF10980@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox