From: "S. P. Prasanna" <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
Ville Syrj?l? <syrjala@sci.fi>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>,
Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:41:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070621071125.GA6615@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1182403401.2863.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:23:21PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:50 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >
> > > the real fix would be something like this instead:
> >
> > If people can test this, and confirm it works, please send a patch that
> > not only does this ad undoes the Kconfig language. It looks like the
> > right thing to do, but I won't touch it without somebody who actually
> > tested these combinarions sending in a patch.
>
> Hi,
>
> I have tested this on x86_64, and without the config language, the
> original oopses, while with the patch below it works fine (as expected).
> I've not been able to test the i386 one (no 32 bit testboxes since 2
> years) but the change is even simpler there, just an ifdef around the
> entire kernel text marking.
I tested this patch on i386 box, it seems to work fine.
Thanks
Prasanna
>
>
>
> Do not mark the kernel text read only if KPROBES is in the kernel;
> kprobes needs to hot-patch the kernel text to insert it's
> instrumentation. In this case, only mark the .rodata segment as read
> only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
>
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug.org 2007-06-20 22:20:30.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug 2007-06-20 22:20:55.000000000 -0700
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ config DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> config DEBUG_RODATA
> bool "Write protect kernel read-only data structures"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> - depends on !KPROBES # temporary for 2.6.22
> help
> Mark the kernel read-only data as write-protected in the pagetables,
> in order to catch accidental (and incorrect) writes to such const
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/Kconfig.debug.org 2007-06-20 22:20:28.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/Kconfig.debug 2007-06-20 22:20:44.000000000 -0700
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ source "lib/Kconfig.debug"
> config DEBUG_RODATA
> bool "Write protect kernel read-only data structures"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> - depends on !KPROBES # temporary for 2.6.22
> help
> Mark the kernel read-only data as write-protected in the pagetables,
> in order to catch accidental (and incorrect) writes to such const data.
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/i386/mm/init.c.org 2007-06-20 22:18:40.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2007-06-20 22:19:45.000000000 -0700
> @@ -799,6 +799,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
> unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
> unsigned long size = PFN_ALIGN(_etext) - start;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_KPROBES
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> /* It must still be possible to apply SMP alternatives. */
> if (num_possible_cpus() <= 1)
> @@ -808,7 +809,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
> size >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_KERNEL_RX);
> printk("Write protecting the kernel text: %luk\n", size >> 10);
> }
> -
> +#endif
> start += size;
> size = (unsigned long)__end_rodata - start;
> change_page_attr(virt_to_page(start),
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c.org 2007-06-20 21:44:15.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c 2007-06-20 22:17:45.000000000 -0700
> @@ -605,6 +605,11 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
> if (num_possible_cpus() > 1)
> start = (unsigned long)_etext;
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> + start = (unsigned long)__start_rodata;
> +#endif
> +
> end = (unsigned long)__end_rodata;
> start = (start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & PAGE_MASK;
> end &= PAGE_MASK;
>
> --
> if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
> Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
--
Thanks & Regards
Prasanna S.P.
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs, IBM Bangalore
Email: prasanna@in.ibm.com
Ph: 91-80-41776329
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-21 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-17 14:23 [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-17 15:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-17 15:31 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-20 22:08 ` Ian McDonald
2007-06-20 22:31 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-06-20 22:38 ` Ian McDonald
2007-06-20 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-20 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-20 22:41 ` Ian McDonald
2007-06-20 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-20 23:02 ` Ian McDonald
2007-06-20 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 15:46 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-06-20 23:07 ` Dave Jones
2007-06-20 23:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-20 23:24 ` Dave Jones
2007-06-20 23:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 9:19 ` [PATCH] Alternative fix for kprobes&DEBUG_RODATA was " Andi Kleen
2007-06-21 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-20 23:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-20 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-21 5:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-21 7:11 ` S. P. Prasanna [this message]
2007-06-21 14:35 ` Stefan Richter
2007-06-21 14:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070621071125.GA6615@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz \
--cc=kernel@nn7.de \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=r.marek@assembler.cz \
--cc=syrjala@sci.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox