From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@rfo.atmel.com>,
ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:00:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070622070041.GA18997@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706220513140.8870@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 05:26:33AM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > > > The oops seems to occur after a page unmapping using dma_unmap_page() followed
> > > > by a flush_dcache_page() (in at91mci_post_dma_read()).
> >
> > Was the page allocated using slab calls?
>
> You've found yes (in the ARM case).
>
> > Well one may be better off allocating pages using the page allocator
> > instead of the slab allocator. I removed these things from i386 but I did
> > not check ARM.
>
> They may or may not be: I think that's a matter to discuss with rmk.
The coherent case on ARM is broken in more ways, not only because
it uses kmalloc, but it also takes no notice of the DMA mask.
However, AT91 isn't a coherent ARM architecture, so arch_is_coherent()
should be false. Therefore, we should never be allocating pages for
DMA from SLAB/SLUB for AT91 platforms.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-22 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 9:30 Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-21 14:54 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-21 14:57 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-21 15:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-22 6:28 ` [PATCH] mmc-atmel : fix kunmap wrong usage Marc Pignat
2007-06-22 12:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 13:34 ` Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-22 13:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 14:21 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-22 14:58 ` Marc Pignat
2007-06-22 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-06-22 9:09 ` Oops in a driver while using SLUB as a SLAB allocator Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-21 22:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 4:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 5:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 7:00 ` Russell King [this message]
2007-06-22 1:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 4:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 5:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 5:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-22 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 17:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 18:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 19:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 19:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 20:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 22:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 20:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-23 10:40 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-24 8:38 ` Russell King
2007-06-24 10:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-24 10:51 ` Russell King
2007-06-25 0:25 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 13:55 ` Nicolas Ferre
2007-06-25 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 16:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 17:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 18:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-25 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-25 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-26 18:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 20:18 ` Russell King
2007-06-22 1:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-22 4:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-22 5:31 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070622070041.GA18997@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew@sanpeople.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@rfo.atmel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox