public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bracing the loop in kernel/softirq.c
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:54:09 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070622155409.GA8283@cvg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467AC8E9.1000605@goop.org>

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge - Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:52:25AM -0700]
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>> On 20/06/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This trivial patch adds braces over a one-line
>>> loop. That makes code...well... little bit
>>> convenient for (possible) further modifications.
>>>
>> That's generally not done.
>>
>> It's even in Documentation/CodingStyle :
>>
>> "
>> Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
>>
>> if (condition)
>>        action();
>> "
>
> I tend to see "do {} while()" as an exception to this.  I find the 
> construct is sufficiently rare that it helps to emphasize it a bit.  For 
> example if I'm scanning code and I see:
>
> 	while (foo != NULL);
>
> in the corner of my eye, I'm going to think "huh?".  But:
>
> 	} while (foo != NULL);
>
> visually "parses" properly, regardless of how near or far the corresponding 
> "do  {" is.
>
> (And of course, its consistent with the super extra special while-while 
> loop:
>
> 	while (foo != NULL) {
> 		foo = bar();
> 		piffle();
> 	} while (foo != NULL);	// make sure we loop properly
>
> ;)
>
>    J
>

Btw, Jeremy, could you please Ack it then and I'll resend the patch to Andrew ;)

		Cyrill


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-22 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-20 17:57 [PATCH] bracing the loop in kernel/softirq.c Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-20 21:01 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-21 13:49   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-21 17:20     ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-21 17:32       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-21 18:52   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-21 19:11     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2007-06-22 15:54     ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2007-06-22 18:05       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070622155409.GA8283@cvg \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox