From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
To: Alberto Gonzalez <info@gnebu.es>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about fair schedulers
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:06:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070623090655.36d1794c@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706230007.15622.info@gnebu.es>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:07:15 +0200
Alberto Gonzalez <info@gnebu.es> wrote:
> My conclusion is that SD behaves as expected: it's more fair. But for a
> desktop, shouldn't an "intelligently unfair" scheduler be better?
"intelligently unfair" is what the current scheduler is (because of
interactivity estimator).
When it works (say 90% of the time) the desktop feels really good...
but when it doesn't it can be a disaster.
Look this for example:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/6aa5c93c379ae9e1/98ab31c0e6fed2ee?&hl=en#98ab31c0e6fed2ee
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.22-rc5-g0864a4e2 on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-23 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-22 22:07 Question about fair schedulers Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 0:55 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-06-23 7:46 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 16:35 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-06-23 17:28 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-24 20:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-24 19:36 ` David Schwartz
2007-06-26 12:19 ` Helge Hafting
2007-06-27 12:39 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 7:06 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2007-06-23 8:01 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 8:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-23 9:18 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 9:28 ` Russell Harmon
2007-06-23 10:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-23 10:45 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 10:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-23 11:00 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 11:05 ` Tom Spink
2007-06-23 11:26 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 11:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-27 20:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-06-23 13:26 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-06-23 13:56 ` Alberto Gonzalez
2007-06-23 14:28 ` Paolo Ornati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070623090655.36d1794c@localhost \
--to=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=info@gnebu.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox