From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
Cc: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>,
trivial@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:57:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070623135721.GP23017@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070623134126.GN19904@flower.upol.cz>
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:13:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 09:59:33AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> []
> > > > From: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > the explicit memset call could be optimized out by data initialization,
> > > > thus all the fill working can be done by the compiler implicitly.
> > >
> > > Can be optimized and can be done by compiler are just words;
> > >
> > > > and C standard guaranteed all the unspecified data field initialized to zero.
> > >
> > > standards and implementation are on opposite poles of magnet
> >
> > Bullshit.
> >
> > We expect a C compiler, and if a C compiler violates the C standard
> > that's a bug in the compiler that has to be fixed.
>
> If you are serious, please consider last kernel headers vs ANSI C
> discussion,
If only Joerg would tell us where the problem exactly is...
There might be a bug in the kernel header, but this simply has to be
fixed.
> then GNU extensions of the GCC C compiler and relevant "if
> ICC doesn't support GCC extensions it's ICC's bug".
gcc is a C compiler and claims to follow the C standard.
The kernel does not claim to be compilable by a plain C compiler.
Spot the difference?
> That was about
> implementation. About standards you are not serious, aren't you?
> (Please don't see this as for this particular case, but as general
> viewpoint)
And as with many generalizations, that's often wrong...
> > And gcc is usually quite good in following the C standard.
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > After comments in the former threads:
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/18/119
> > >
> > > i see a patch
> > >
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/18/48
> > >
> > > same patch.
> > >...
> >
> > Open your eyes and you'll find thread overviews at the left side of
> > the URLs he gave...
>
> Two threads with *different* URLs but with *same* patch...
>...
The comments are in the _threads_.
The patches are only the roots of the threads.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-23 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-23 5:15 [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization Denis Cheng
2007-06-23 7:59 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-23 13:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-23 13:41 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-23 13:57 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-06-23 15:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-24 12:58 ` rae l
2007-06-24 22:25 ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-24 22:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-24 23:23 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 0:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 0:12 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-06-25 0:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 0:41 ` -Os versus -O2 Adrian Bunk
2007-06-25 0:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 1:08 ` david
2007-06-25 1:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-25 1:33 ` david
2007-06-25 1:41 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-25 5:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-25 7:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 7:15 ` david
2007-06-25 7:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 8:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-06-25 8:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 7:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 7:13 ` david
2007-06-25 7:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 1:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-25 1:23 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-25 1:31 ` Rene Herman
2007-06-25 1:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-25 1:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-25 2:19 ` david
2007-06-24 23:33 ` memset() with zeroes (Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization) Oleg Verych
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-18 10:05 [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array variable should be optimized out by data initialization Denis Cheng
2007-06-18 10:25 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-06-18 14:24 ` WANG Cong
2007-06-18 17:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-06-19 13:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-06-21 13:21 ` rae l
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070623135721.GP23017@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=crquan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox