From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
eranian@hpl.hp.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
levon@movementarian.org, perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, wcohen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:36:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706252136.18366.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070625120926.0a86373c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Monday 25 June 2007 21:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:34:48 +0200
>
> Bj__rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> wrote:
> > The performance counter allocator relies on the nmi watchdog being
> > probed, so we have to do that even if the watchdog is not enabled.
>
> So... what's the status of this lot?
>
> I've just merged this patch and the second one:
>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel
> PerfMon NMI watchdog Message-ID: <20070620183551.GC3251@atjola.homenet>
>
> but there was no followup discussion afaict.
>
> Andi, Stephane: acks?
Yes, although I'm still a little uneasy about the always probe one.
> If acked, do we agree that this is 2.6.22 material?
The first (always probe) is probably .22 material, but needs more testing
first.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-25 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-12 15:02 OProfile issues Stephane Eranian
2007-06-12 18:37 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-12 18:38 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-06-12 19:07 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-13 1:41 ` [PATCH] Separate performance counter reservation from nmi watchdog Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-13 16:46 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-18 9:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-18 10:32 ` Björn Steinbrink
[not found] ` <11823357571842-git-send-email->
2007-06-20 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 10:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] Finish separation of the performance counter allocator from the " Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC " Andi Kleen
2007-06-20 12:49 ` [perfmon] " Stephane Eranian
2007-06-20 13:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-20 18:33 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the " Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-25 19:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-25 19:36 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-06-25 20:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-25 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-25 21:04 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-25 21:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 18:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel PerfMon " Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 21:59 ` [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC " Stephane Eranian
2007-06-21 8:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-22 7:13 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-22 10:02 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-20 13:18 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-06-20 10:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] Performance counter allocator separation Björn Steinbrink
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-26 8:04 [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog Mikael Pettersson
2007-06-26 9:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-06-26 10:35 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706252136.18366.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=levon@movementarian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=perfmon@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).