public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch, v2.6.22-rc6] sys_time() speedup
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:43:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070626154305.GE7059@v2.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070625151508.86fa3778.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 03:15:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Interesting question.  The patch adds a new test-n-branch to gettimeofday()
> so if gettimeofday() is used much more frequently than time(), we lose.

I think gettimeofday is generally used much more frequently than
time. Real db calls gettimeofday not time, infact some real db related
app even go as far as calling rdtsc directly (on hardware where the
tsc is synchronized). What's the point of calling time so many times
per second when it'll always return the same value anyway?

I think this is a case of the simulator not simulating the real
workload and hence that should be fixed instead of optimizing for the
erratic simulator.

Just place a systemtap for time and gettimeofday, run a real db or a
videogame and then show the number of time vs gettimeofday calls.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-26 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-25 20:06 [patch, v2.6.22-rc6] sys_time() speedup Ingo Molnar
2007-06-25 21:09 ` Roman Zippel
2007-06-25 21:17   ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-25 22:00     ` Roman Zippel
2007-06-25 22:20       ` Jesper Juhl
2007-06-25 22:49         ` Roman Zippel
2007-06-26 16:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-26 16:39           ` Roman Zippel
2007-06-26 16:49           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-06-26 17:13             ` Ray Lee
2007-06-27  0:15               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-06-26 17:08           ` Roman Zippel
2007-06-26 17:35             ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-25 22:15   ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-26  2:20     ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-06-26 15:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-26 17:14       ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-27  0:22         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2007-06-26 15:43     ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2007-06-26 17:36     ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-25 22:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-06-26  0:22 ` Mark Lord
2007-06-26 14:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-26 16:59     ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070626154305.GE7059@v2.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox