Re: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

James Morris
2007-06-27T19:29:18Z

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

> Patch tests fine for me for expected capability behavior with lsm=n,
> lsm=y, lsm=y+capability=y, lsm=y+selinux=y, and lsm=y+caps=y+selinux=y.
>
> So while I'm opposed to the patch, it appears to be safe.

I've also tested a bunch of scenarios: allmodconfig, lsm=y,cap=n,
selinux=y,cap=n etc.

--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>