Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

Sean
2007-06-27T21:29:56Z

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:06:04 -0700
Crispin Cowan <crispin@novell.com> wrote:

> I am hoping for a reconciliation where the people who don't like
> AppArmor live with it by not using it. AppArmor is not intended to
> replace SELinux, it is intended to address a different set of goals.

You keep saying that. But for that to be true you'd have to believe
_everyone_ using Novell distributions has needs that align exactly
with AppArmor. Otherwise, how to explain that you don't offer and
support both SELinux and AppArmor to your users?

It seems as far as Novell is concerned, AppArmor _is_ meant to replace
SELinux. Not that there is really anything wrong with that, but it's
a little disingenuous to then argue that they're meant to coexist.

Sean