From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932170AbXF1X5V (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:57:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759390AbXF1X5P (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:57:15 -0400 Received: from mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.199]:52560 "EHLO mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760948AbXF1X5O (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:57:14 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: "Siddha, Suresh B" Subject: Re: Wrong cache size reported on Q6600 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:57:08 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200706290931.45355.kernel@kolivas.org> <20070628233312.GB30594@linux-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20070628233312.GB30594@linux-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706290957.08128.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 29 June 2007 09:33, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:31:44AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > This is a Q6600 which has cache size of 8 MB. Unless it's reporting each > > half's effective L2, I think it should be reporting 8192 instead of 4096. > > There are two L2's, each of 4MB. Each L2 shared by two cores. That was what I wasn't sure of as I said above; thanks for clarifying. -- -ck