public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram.
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:11:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070630101112.GA10444@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706301215.20334.rjw@sisk.pl>

Hi!

> > > Sorry, but I can't resist the opportunity to say "Send a patch!" :)
> > > 
> > > Seriously, though, I'd prefer not to. If we rename that acpi video flags 
> > > variable (I assume this is what you're thinking of), we only create cause for 
> > > confusion. A variable should for debugging or for controlling quirks, not for 
> > > both at the same time.
> > 
> > Cause for confusion? We are currently using 2 bits of that variable,
> > and we want to add one more bit. I seriously doubt that can confuse
> > anyone.
> 
> Well, indeed it would be more elegant to rename the existing flags variable
> and use another bit out of it, but I personally don't think it's _that_
> important.  At least, I don't think we should block the patch
> because of that.

It is not _that_ important.

> BTW, has anyone confirmed that it works on i386?

If you have patch somewhere nearby, I can test it on i386 and make it
use just one flags variable.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-30 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-19 11:18 [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-19 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-20 22:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-20 22:24     ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-21 21:20       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-28 14:25 ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-28 22:27   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-06-29 18:03     ` Stefan Seyfried
2007-06-29 22:35     ` Pavel Machek
2007-06-30 10:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-30 10:11         ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-06-30 20:30           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-04 21:29             ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 21:50               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-04 22:46                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-05 19:03                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 22:32                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 22:34               ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 22:48                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 22:56                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 23:01                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 23:10                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 23:25                         ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-05 18:43                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 22:37                             ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070630101112.GA10444@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox