From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH][XFS][resend] fix memory leak in xfs_inactive()
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 01:16:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707010116.52012.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> (raw)
(this is back from May 16 2007, resending since it doesn't look like
the patch ever made it in anywhere)
The Coverity checker found a memory leak in xfs_inactive().
The offending code is this bit :
1671 tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_INACTIVE);
At conditional (1): "truncate != 0" taking true path
1672 if (truncate) {
1673 /*
1674 * Do the xfs_itruncate_start() call before
1675 * reserving any log space because itruncate_start
1676 * will call into the buffer cache and we can't
1677 * do that within a transaction.
1678 */
1679 xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
1680
1681 error = xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE, 0);
At conditional (2): "error != 0" taking true path
1682 if (error) {
1683 xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
Event leaked_storage: Returned without freeing storage "tp"
Also see events: [alloc_fn][var_assign]
1684 return VN_INACTIVE_CACHE;
1685 }
So, the code allocates a transaction, but in the case where 'truncate' is !=0 and xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE, 0); happens to return an error, we'll just return from the function without dealing with the memory allocated byxfs_trans_alloc() and assigned to 'tp', thus it'll be orphaned/leaked - not good.
The bug was introduced by this commit:
http://git2.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d3cf209476b72c83907a412b6708c5e498410aa7
The patch below is
From: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.x-xfs-new.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2007-05-11 16:04:03.000000000 +1000
+++ 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2007-05-17 12:37:25.671399078 +1000
@@ -1710,6 +1710,7 @@ xfs_inactive(
error = xfs_itruncate_start(ip, XFS_ITRUNC_DEFINITE, 0);
if (error) {
+ xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0);
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
return VN_INACTIVE_CACHE;
}
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-30 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-30 23:16 Jesper Juhl [this message]
2007-07-01 22:31 ` [PATCH][XFS][resend] fix memory leak in xfs_inactive() David Chinner
2007-07-02 1:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-07-02 1:23 ` [xfs-masters] " Timothy Shimmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707010116.52012.jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox