From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760768AbXGCU1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:27:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757225AbXGCU0v (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:26:51 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:29551 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757859AbXGCU0u (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:26:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AsJj5o4gBu0e+JqReUf+qfMvLg8k8O/EXyJqi3PKRiGQ8xtTC73g2n2DuNOtWyOI0iZvtFGpIOEBOBYduno8sES7H0GzGKBHuaX93G9AzagzrdeZd7oLbC4YQnyjL7oDymrqB3Pz253u4iKkQoGKhTFLBtJ2aDzk4ex9Ygu4S6E= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Linas Vepstas Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix] hpt366: use correct enablebits for HPT36x Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:06:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , michal.kepien@poczta.onet.pl, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200706300004.22274.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <20070703162641.GA4302@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070703162641.GA4302@austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707032107.00131.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Linas Vepstas wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:04:22AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > The HPT36x chips finally turned out to have the channel enable bits -- however, > > badly implemented. Make use of them despite it's probably only going to burden > > the driver's code -- assuming both channels are always enabled by the HighPoint > > BIOS anyway... > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > > > --- > > Michal, Linas, please verify the patch... :-) > > No negative impact for me. > > (Am I supposed to acked-by if I do this kind of review/test?) added your ACK also for this patch Bart