* [RFC] disabling RTC irq during release
@ 2007-07-04 17:07 Rodolfo Giometti
2007-07-10 18:29 ` David Brownell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rodolfo Giometti @ 2007-07-04 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
Looking at other rtc drivers I noticed that during the release()
method we should disable IRQs as follow:
static void ds1307_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct ds1307 *ds1307 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
if (ds1307->irq >= 0) {
ds1307->irqen = 0;
ds1307_update_alarm(ds1307);
}
}
that's the code I put into my patch for ds1339.
But if I wish using RTC IRQ line to turn also the board ON, not just
to put to sleep it, I should leave the IRQ line on!
I think we should add a configuration option who allows developers to
choose if the RTC IRQ line should be disabled or not during release().
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com
Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC] disabling RTC irq during release
2007-07-04 17:07 [RFC] disabling RTC irq during release Rodolfo Giometti
@ 2007-07-10 18:29 ` David Brownell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Brownell @ 2007-07-10 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rodolfo Giometti; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wednesday 04 July 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking at other rtc drivers I noticed that during the release()
> method we should disable IRQs as follow:
>
> static void ds1307_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct ds1307 *ds1307 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> if (ds1307->irq >= 0) {
> ds1307->irqen = 0;
> ds1307_update_alarm(ds1307);
> }
> }
On the RTC list, the outcome of that discussion was that
the release() method -- not generally implemented at this
time, and only supporting the /dev/rtcN access mode -- should
only disable the IRQs enabled through that /dev/rtcN file.
Now, it turns out that of the three kinds of RTC IRQ (alarm,
once-per-second, and 2^N-per-second), two of those modes can
be accessed through in-kernel APIs outside /dev/rtcN calls:
- 2^N-per-second "periodic" irqs, using rtc_irq_set_freq()
and rtc_irq_set_state()
- alarm irqs, using rtc_set_alarm()
So it would be incorrect to disable those IRQs, when some
other kernel activity had enabled them. But for now it
would be correct to always disable once-per-second "update"
IRQs in a release() method.
There's a separate issue -- longstanding, not new to the
RTC framework -- of how several consumers of RTC IRQs ought
to share the different kinds of IRQ.
> But if I wish using RTC IRQ line to turn also the board ON, not just
> to put to sleep it, I should leave the IRQ line on!
That can be done with /sys/class/rtcN/device/power/wakealarm,
writing it to the time (in seconds) the RTC alarm should kick
the board's power-on circuitry.
- Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-10 18:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-04 17:07 [RFC] disabling RTC irq during release Rodolfo Giometti
2007-07-10 18:29 ` David Brownell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox