From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759104AbXGDRw2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:52:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755876AbXGDRwV (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:52:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39501 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755014AbXGDRwU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:52:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 13:51:42 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Jan Beulich , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make SMP locks handling interact properly with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (2nd try) Message-ID: <20070704175142.GA3795@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Jan Beulich , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@x86-64.org References: <468B5B54.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <468BBFB3.9080303@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468BBFB3.9080303@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:41:39AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > I'd already posted a patch to remove smp alternatives. I thought it had > been merged already, but I guess it's in Andi's queue. What was the rationale behind that? Given many distros have now moved to shipping just an SMP kernel, this seems like a step backwards? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk