From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759742AbXGENrU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:47:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757033AbXGENrN (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:47:13 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:50315 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757113AbXGENrM (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:47:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:46:32 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Oliver Neukum Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Miklos Szeredi , paulus@samba.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, benh@kernel.crashing.org Message-ID: <20070705134632.GA22177@srcf.ucam.org> References: <18059.10554.955290.148535@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200707051523.44826.rjw@sisk.pl> <200707051528.34754.oliver@neukum.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707051528.34754.oliver@neukum.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:35:45 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vavatch.codon.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > If, at a minimum, we can determine that we can STD without a freezer. > It makes no sense to invest a lot of work to face the same problem > again with STD. I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of userspace, but I need to find some more time to flesh it out. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org