From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763252AbXGEXYY (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:24:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762979AbXGEXWn (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:22:43 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:52140 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762975AbXGEXWl (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:22:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 01:23:11 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: pj@sgi.com, simon.derr@bull.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [2.6 patch] kernel/cpuset.c: cleanups Message-ID: <20070705232311.GZ3492@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch contains the following cleanups: - make the following needlessly global functions static: - cpuset_can_attach() - cpuset_attach() - cpuset_populate() - cpuset_post_clone() - cpuset_create() - cpuset_destroy() - remove the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuset_mem_spread_node) Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- kernel/cpuset.c | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/kernel/cpuset.c.old 2007-07-03 15:40:33.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/kernel/cpuset.c 2007-07-04 23:32:06.000000000 +0200 @@ -873,8 +873,8 @@ return val; } -int cpuset_can_attach(struct container_subsys *ss, - struct container *cont, struct task_struct *tsk) +static int cpuset_can_attach(struct container_subsys *ss, + struct container *cont, struct task_struct *tsk) { struct cpuset *cs = container_cs(cont); @@ -884,9 +884,9 @@ return security_task_setscheduler(tsk, 0, NULL); } -void cpuset_attach(struct container_subsys *ss, - struct container *cont, struct container *oldcont, - struct task_struct *tsk) +static void cpuset_attach(struct container_subsys *ss, + struct container *cont, struct container *oldcont, + struct task_struct *tsk) { cpumask_t cpus; nodemask_t from, to; @@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@ .private = FILE_SPREAD_SLAB, }; -int cpuset_populate(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont) +static int cpuset_populate(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont) { int err; @@ -1205,8 +1205,8 @@ * changed to grant parent->cpus_allowed-sibling_cpus_exclusive * (and likewise for mems) to the new container. */ -void cpuset_post_clone(struct container_subsys *ss, - struct container *container) +static void cpuset_post_clone(struct container_subsys *ss, + struct container *container) { struct container *parent, *child; struct cpuset *cs, *parent_cs; @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ * Must be called with the mutex on the parent inode held */ -int cpuset_create(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont) +static int cpuset_create(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont) { struct cpuset *cs; struct cpuset *parent; @@ -1269,7 +1269,7 @@ return 0; } -void cpuset_destroy(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont) +static void cpuset_destroy(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont) { struct cpuset *cs = container_cs(cont); @@ -1726,7 +1726,6 @@ current->cpuset_mem_spread_rotor = node; return node; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpuset_mem_spread_node); /** * cpuset_excl_nodes_overlap - Do we overlap @p's mem_exclusive ancestors?