From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:23:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070706142339.GA32754@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070706060257.GA188@tv-sign.ru>
* Oleg Nesterov (oleg@tv-sign.ru) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds the ability to protect critical sections from migration to
> > another CPU without disabling preemption.
> >
> > Typical use:
> >
> > migration_disable();
> > local_inc(&__get_cpu_var(&my_local_t_var));
> > migration_enable();
> >
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/sched.c 2007-07-05 16:28:15.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/sched.c 2007-07-05 16:53:24.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -1996,6 +1996,7 @@
> > * 1) running (obviously), or
> > * 2) cannot be migrated to this CPU due to cpus_allowed, or
> > * 3) are cache-hot on their current CPU.
> > + * 4) migration preemption is non 0 for this non running task.
> > */
> > if (!cpu_isset(this_cpu, p->cpus_allowed))
> > return 0;
> > @@ -2003,6 +2004,8 @@
> >
> > if (task_running(rq, p))
> > return 0;
> > + if (task_thread_info(p)->migration_count)
> > + return 0;
>
Hi Oleg,
> Question: This means that the task could be preempted, but can't sleep, yes?
>
No exactly. This means that the task can be preempted, and can therefore
sleep, but we do not allow this sleeping task to be migrated to a
different CPU.
> Because try_to_wake_up() can change ->cpu. Shouldn't might_sleep() check
> ->migration_count then? Or we can change try_to_wake_up().
>
If we look at try_to_wake_up, it seems to take the new_cpu from
task_cpu(), which comes from the thread info ->cpu, updated by
set_task_cpu(). The *_move_tasks seems to be responsible for calling
can_migrate_task() to see if, in a deferred way, the migration_thread
can use set_task_cpu() to change the task's cpu.
move_task_off_dead_cpu() does not seem to respect this though: it could
potentially move away a process while it is in a critical section by
forcing a __migrate_task. I guess I should put a test in __migrate_task
also so move_task_off_dead_cpu() can try to repeat the migration.
> What if the task does copy_process() under migration_disable() ? Child
> gets a copy of ->migration_count.
>
Right. Neighter does copy_process set the preemption count. It seems to
be dealt by sched_fork() when the thread is first scheduled in to make
sure that the preempt count is 1. I guess is would be safer to set the
migration count to 0 there too. (or set it to one if we ever decide to
make it the kernel default).
> Also, cpu_down() still can migrate this task to another CPU.
>
Yes, just noted this earlier. I first thought it was using
can_migrate_task(), but it does not seem so.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> Oleg.
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-06 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-06 6:02 [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-06 14:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-07-06 14:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-11 4:49 ` [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption - v2 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-11 16:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-14 18:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 19:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-14 18:40 ` [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption - v3 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 18:42 ` [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption - v4 Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-14 20:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-14 20:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-14 20:33 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-14 20:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-05 21:51 [RFC] Thread Migration Preemption Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-05 22:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-07-06 6:12 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-06 14:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-06 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-07-06 15:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-07-08 9:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-10 23:39 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-11 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-11 0:36 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-11 0:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-11 1:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-06 11:59 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-06 14:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-06 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-11 4:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-23 18:33 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070706142339.GA32754@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox