From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764345AbXGFV34 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:29:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762692AbXGFV3s (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:29:48 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.93.40.71]:46168 "EHLO holomorphy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762840AbXGFV3r (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:29:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:31:21 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: state of stack patches Message-ID: <20070706213121.GI11781@holomorphy.com> References: <468D55D1.7070308@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <468D55D1.7070308@goop.org> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:34:25PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > What's the state of your stack patches? I'm still using the ones you > posted some time ago, and they seem like useful things to have in the > kernel. Is there anything preventing you from pushing them upstream? Just one thing: 2.6.22. I can, of course, do updating for -mm, -ak, et al. -- wli