From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, ak@suse.de, ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] cpu_callout_map cleanups
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 03:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070707010327.GX3492@stusta.de> (raw)
This patch contains the following cleanups regarding cpu_callout_map:
- i386/x86_64: removed unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's
- m32r: made static
- mips: removed extern for non-existing variable from header
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 -
arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c | 1 -
arch/m32r/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +--
arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 --
include/asm-m32r/smp.h | 6 ------
include/asm-mips/smp.h | 7 -------
6 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c.old 2007-07-06 01:11:32.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c 2007-07-06 01:13:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@
cpumask_t cpu_callin_map;
cpumask_t cpu_callout_map;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_callout_map);
cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map);
static cpumask_t smp_commenced_mask;
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c.old 2007-07-06 01:14:20.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c 2007-07-06 01:14:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -235,7 +235,6 @@
/* This is for the new dynamic CPU boot code */
cpumask_t cpu_callin_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
cpumask_t cpu_callout_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_callout_map);
cpumask_t cpu_possible_map = CPU_MASK_NONE;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map);
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/asm-m32r/smp.h.old 2007-07-06 01:15:59.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/asm-m32r/smp.h 2007-07-06 01:16:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@
#define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
-extern cpumask_t cpu_callout_map;
extern cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
extern cpumask_t cpu_present_map;
@@ -81,11 +80,6 @@
return cpu;
}
-static __inline__ unsigned int num_booting_cpus(void)
-{
- return cpus_weight(cpu_callout_map);
-}
-
extern void smp_send_timer(void);
extern unsigned long send_IPI_mask_phys(cpumask_t, int, int);
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/m32r/kernel/smpboot.c.old 2007-07-06 01:15:35.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/m32r/kernel/smpboot.c 2007-07-06 01:15:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -77,8 +77,7 @@
cpumask_t cpu_bootout_map;
cpumask_t cpu_bootin_map;
static cpumask_t cpu_callin_map;
-cpumask_t cpu_callout_map;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_callout_map);
+static cpumask_t cpu_callout_map;
cpumask_t cpu_possible_map = CPU_MASK_ALL;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map);
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/asm-mips/smp.h.old 2007-07-06 01:16:22.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/asm-mips/smp.h 2007-07-06 01:16:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -49,13 +49,6 @@
extern cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map;
#define cpu_possible_map phys_cpu_present_map
-extern cpumask_t cpu_callout_map;
-/* We don't mark CPUs online until __cpu_up(), so we need another measure */
-static inline int num_booting_cpus(void)
-{
- return cpus_weight(cpu_callout_map);
-}
-
/*
* These are defined by the board-specific code.
*/
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c.old 2007-07-06 01:16:47.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c 2007-07-06 01:17:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -78,8 +78,6 @@
*/
cpumask_t cpu_callin_map;
cpumask_t cpu_callout_map;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_callout_map);
-
cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map);
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-07 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-07 1:03 Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-07-09 13:21 ` [2.6 patch] cpu_callout_map cleanups Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070707010327.GX3492@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox