From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Cc: Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT-Users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"jcaceres@ccrma.Stanford.EDU" <jcaceres@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
Carsten Emde <carsten.emde@osadl.org>
Subject: Re: v2.6.21.5-rt19
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:15:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070707091527.GA21234@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1183758545.20747.34.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu>
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> > Althought I'm still with my fingers crossed, I can tell the good
> > news are that 2.6.21.5-rt19 (and -rt20) does behave far better now
> > on the very same box.
>
> Yes, it works much better indeed...
>
> Ingo: is there a place where I can read about the changes in different
> rtxx releases? What is new/better/fixed in rt20? (I see scheduler
> stuff in a diff from rt19 to rt20 but I don't really know what it
> means).
rt19 -> rt20 was a pure CFS update - from v18 to v19-almost-final.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-07 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-04 20:49 v2.6.21.5-rt19 Thomas Gleixner
2007-07-06 14:10 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Rui Nuno Capela
2007-07-06 21:49 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-07 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-07 9:24 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Ingo Molnar
2007-07-08 22:36 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-08 22:50 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-08 23:42 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Gabriel C
2007-07-09 3:53 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-09 5:08 ` v2.6.21.5-rt19 (sched_getaffinity?) Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-17 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 19:47 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-17 19:56 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-17 20:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 21:41 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-17 23:51 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2007-07-18 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 13:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-07-18 18:02 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070707091527.GA21234@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=carsten.emde@osadl.org \
--cc=jcaceres@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox