From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Please revert 21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:17:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070708231726.GW3492@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707090102.21784.ak@suse.de>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:02:21AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 09 July 2007 00:44:44 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:43:51PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >...
> > > > Andi forwarded it although the following people had already NAK'ed it:
> > > > - Christoph Hellwig [1]
> > > > - Peter Zijlstra [2]
> > > > - Alan Cox [3]
> > > >
> > > > Considering that Andi forwarded it 2 days after he himself said a
> > > > different solution was pending [4] I assume he mistakenly sent it for
> > > > inclusion in your tree.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We played with some ideas, but they all turned out way too ugly to live.
> >
> > Andi got some NAK's, said himself it will be solved differently, and
> > two days later he submits the NAK'ed patch into Linus' tree.
>
> It will be solved differently longer term, but short term the fix
> was still needed. There are limits on what can be done late
> in the release cycle so simple patches win.
Your patch got into Linus' tree in the middle of the merge window...
> Besides none of the "NAK"s were particularly inspired in my opinion;
> there were no clear technical objections brought forward.
Why didn't you say this?
Your answer in [1] didn't sound as if you would submit this patch, and
even less that you would submit it just two days later.
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/30/335
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-08 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-17 21:42 Please revert 21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7 Adrian Bunk
2007-06-18 4:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-08 22:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-08 23:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-08 23:17 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-07-09 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-09 10:06 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-09 10:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-09 9:32 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-09 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-09 14:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-09 2:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-09 9:51 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-09 13:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070708231726.GW3492@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox