Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API)

David Woodhouse
2007-06-26T18:20:30Z

On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 20:13 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 06:38:40PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > That sounds like you're scared of using goto. Don't be :)
>
> But it's not wrong... should I change it or not?

I would suggest changing it. It makes it more obvious to the casual that
there are no other callers of the 'internal' functions. It's a matter of
taste though; if you feel _very_ strongly about it then feel free to
ignore me.

> Is this right?
> +unifdef-y += pps.h

Yes, that looks right. As a matter of course you should also run 'make
headers_check' before submitting your new patch, to make sure everything
is sane. That'll tell you if your exported pps.h is trying to include
other header files which aren't also exported.

--
dwmw2