From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:47:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711174759.GA17471@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070710210945.GA4231@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.elm3b132.png
>
> thx! I'll check this tomorrow, meanwhile here are a few quick ideas.
ok, i've re-tested this, and could you please try the fix attached
below, combined with a CONFIG_HZ=100 run and with SCHED_DEBUG disabled?
I think a fair bit of the overhead comes from granularity being capped
to 10 msecs instead of the intended 100 msecs.
Ingo
--------------------------------------------->
Subject: [patch] sched: allow larger granularity
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
allow granularity up to 100 msecs, instead of 10 msecs.
(needed on larger boxes)
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4772,7 +4772,7 @@ cpumask_t nohz_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
static inline void sched_init_granularity(void)
{
unsigned int factor = 1 + ilog2(num_online_cpus());
- const unsigned long gran_limit = 10000000;
+ const unsigned long gran_limit = 100000000;
sysctl_sched_granularity *= factor;
if (sysctl_sched_granularity > gran_limit)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-10 17:37 Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?) Martin Bligh
2007-07-10 19:20 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-10 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-11 17:47 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711174759.GA17471@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox