public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:47:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711174759.GA17471@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070710210945.GA4231@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > http://test.kernel.org/perf/kernbench.elm3b132.png
> 
> thx! I'll check this tomorrow, meanwhile here are a few quick ideas.

ok, i've re-tested this, and could you please try the fix attached 
below, combined with a CONFIG_HZ=100 run and with SCHED_DEBUG disabled? 
I think a fair bit of the overhead comes from granularity being capped 
to 10 msecs instead of the intended 100 msecs.

	Ingo

--------------------------------------------->
Subject: [patch] sched: allow larger granularity
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

allow granularity up to 100 msecs, instead of 10 msecs.
(needed on larger boxes)

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4772,7 +4772,7 @@ cpumask_t nohz_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
 static inline void sched_init_granularity(void)
 {
 	unsigned int factor = 1 + ilog2(num_online_cpus());
-	const unsigned long gran_limit = 10000000;
+	const unsigned long gran_limit = 100000000;
 
 	sysctl_sched_granularity *= factor;
 	if (sysctl_sched_granularity > gran_limit)

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-11 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-10 17:37 Performance regression in 2.6.22-git1 (new sched code?) Martin Bligh
2007-07-10 19:20 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-10 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-11 17:47   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070711174759.GA17471@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox