From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932896AbXGLSlw (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756594AbXGLSlp (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:41:45 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:33151 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756558AbXGLSlp (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:41:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:41:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Nish Aravamudan Cc: Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.22.1 Message-ID: <20070712184106.GA22849@kroah.com> References: <20070710200637.GA5881@kroah.com> <29495f1d0707121135u2a07cf04nb8bfe555c5c63679@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29495f1d0707121135u2a07cf04nb8bfe555c5c63679@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:35:41AM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 7/10/07, Greg KH wrote: > > We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.22.1 kernel. > > It contains a security fix for SCTP that somehow forgot to be added to > > the 2.6.22 kernel (was already released in the 2.6.21.y releases). > > Thanks to Patrick McHardy for noticing the mistake. > > > > I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.22.1 > > > > The updated 2.6.22.y git tree can be found at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git > > Can you please also update > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6-stable.git > > ? Maybe make that update part of whatever process you use to push out > the 2.6.Y trees, as I've had to ask for this more than once now? That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not mentioned in the release notes :) I'll let Chris decide if he wishes to maintain it or not, Chris? thanks, greg k-h