* [2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally
@ 2007-07-13 4:18 Adrian Bunk
2007-07-17 12:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2007-07-13 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: linux-kernel
We don't have to check for -fno-optimize-sibling-calls since even
gcc 3.2 supports it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Makefile.old 2007-07-13 06:01:20.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Makefile 2007-07-13 06:01:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@
include $(srctree)/arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile
ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
-CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer $(call cc-option,-fno-optimize-sibling-calls,)
+CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
else
CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer
endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally
2007-07-13 4:18 [2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally Adrian Bunk
@ 2007-07-17 12:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2007-07-17 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:18:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> We don't have to check for -fno-optimize-sibling-calls since even
> gcc 3.2 supports it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Applied,
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-17 12:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-13 4:18 [2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally Adrian Bunk
2007-07-17 12:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox